From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43021C43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC720659 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AWUI5HHl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727211AbfAODG1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:06:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:45141 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726769AbfAODG1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:06:27 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id d39so1340424edb.12; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:06:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=ll9m/aqiuzBB9p5qvWyeWVgdGfxqU+Ww6QX2/aZWj8Y=; b=AWUI5HHlogaXIPvUNe6neRH9r80Mr+8zGEqVXrrhLV3zkz8sYJn9ns/gjq/22Iktul WbSR9UeVXHXZqG9X5KyHlKfr3rpUhBsviOWF834yEHzqlPds8q7+71kaBbO+90ICWWPi 0kX8C7t/zbbsK15ZJ6zBO5txPl88lcrJXCNzjnlqlRsxTjHQIbLypWKywD/UY8KqJFvx w7vCRrBfRRfWkTZBSLAZ6U9XO1a4VFXlIwMkkWMBBrXYvCilWaIAmZyxwY6Pa25qvRQn jx23yjC4E4ABss6Yj2F7SfPkLxh+dvhWqeLhPlrLcRAfBbtZ/csIr8nql8E3X6FFmQ+E mTGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=ll9m/aqiuzBB9p5qvWyeWVgdGfxqU+Ww6QX2/aZWj8Y=; b=jeX1BafhXYYZJs2aWbot+PegiurHWyAR8ZjCaG0xIL1s96BMIyjvS/Vzz990rw+6k7 jB4v5fiOzI/Ogx+iAy5XdMkWiDyqp/pEfuVqL1x/ORNSpXR5hnsvlR76tj+QYVyHO2PB 5GPOje9uYAqa38O+kmPE6c2FtV9C65zRASxzfSkJ10Mer8Oxp0oiYWFl1jONWIiNy1q5 O9Ld2jIeSzPK/5oJ6Fl6CSy+K3/6RFhQN943jg+Tm5YT5ZDj6zZDnZzUvuJCTm39SoEW yXnQv/nyAlaydilx14f5q/te0p70iYpSoX1sbj+Hx53mDuBbDXpmtw/MulDIUzj7QmEJ VmUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcsuf9C1zXb6VWQoGZ+gTcCQqp+9R4vo+jW4bwussxJRE2doJw8 VjOQCW0ZVHZCnRmPRxzgrcEjwtda X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7KNtijN7WCh3zkzb+h2IY2JQsjRri3EskFLT7WlVOu3kcGdbQhm4J2drDKfiEeOy4ioGvslA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a4cf:: with SMTP id cc15-v6mr1440626ejb.157.1547521585037; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:06:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from bebop.suse.de ([189.58.144.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a38sm4510484edd.44.2019.01.14.19.06.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:06:23 -0800 (PST) From: Marcos Paulo de Souza To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marcos Paulo de Souza , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org (open list:BLOCK LAYER) Subject: [PATCH] block/blk-sysfs.c: Remove last reference of blk_init_queue Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 01:06:15 -0200 Message-Id: <20190115030615.1090578-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org blk_init_queue was removed in a1ce35fa4985. Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza --- There are more two references in Documentation/block/biodoc.txt, but maybe that file needs a rewrite in rst anyway? block/blk-sysfs.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index 590d1ef2f961..dd9b50226c6e 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -821,10 +821,9 @@ static void blk_free_queue_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head) * @work: pointer to the release_work member of the request queue to be released * * Description: - * blk_release_queue is the counterpart of blk_init_queue(). It should be - * called when a request queue is being released; typically when a block - * device is being de-registered. Its primary task it to free the queue - * itself. + * Should be called when a request queue is being released; + * typically when a block device is being de-registered. Its primary task it + * to free the queue itself. * * Notes: * The low level driver must have finished any outstanding requests first -- 2.16.4