* [PATCH v2 1/3] blk-iolatency: fix IO hang due to negative inflight counter
2019-01-25 0:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] iolatency bug fix Liu Bo
@ 2019-01-25 0:12 ` Liu Bo
2019-01-25 8:30 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-25 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Blk-iolatency: warn on negative inflight IO counter Liu Bo
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu Bo @ 2019-01-25 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block; +Cc: Josef Bacik, Jens Axboe
Our test reported the following stack, and vmcore showed that
->inflight counter is -1.
[ffffc9003fcc38d0] __schedule at ffffffff8173d95d
[ffffc9003fcc3958] schedule at ffffffff8173de26
[ffffc9003fcc3970] io_schedule at ffffffff810bb6b6
[ffffc9003fcc3988] blkcg_iolatency_throttle at ffffffff813911cb
[ffffc9003fcc3a20] rq_qos_throttle at ffffffff813847f3
[ffffc9003fcc3a48] blk_mq_make_request at ffffffff8137468a
[ffffc9003fcc3b08] generic_make_request at ffffffff81368b49
[ffffc9003fcc3b68] submit_bio at ffffffff81368d7d
[ffffc9003fcc3bb8] ext4_io_submit at ffffffffa031be00 [ext4]
[ffffc9003fcc3c00] ext4_writepages at ffffffffa03163de [ext4]
[ffffc9003fcc3d68] do_writepages at ffffffff811c49ae
[ffffc9003fcc3d78] __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffff811b6188
[ffffc9003fcc3e30] filemap_write_and_wait_range at ffffffff811b6301
[ffffc9003fcc3e60] ext4_sync_file at ffffffffa030cee8 [ext4]
[ffffc9003fcc3ea8] vfs_fsync_range at ffffffff8128594b
[ffffc9003fcc3ee8] do_fsync at ffffffff81285abd
[ffffc9003fcc3f18] sys_fsync at ffffffff81285d50
[ffffc9003fcc3f28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003c04
[ffffc9003fcc3f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs at ffffffff81742b8e
The ->inflight counter may be negative (-1) if
1) blk-iolatency was disabled when the IO was issued,
2) blk-iolatency was enabled before this IO reached its endio,
3) the ->inflight counter is decreased from 0 to -1 in endio()
In fact the hang can be easily reproduced by the below script,
H=/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/
P=/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/test
echo "+io" > $H/cgroup.subtree_control
mkdir -p $P
echo $$ > $P/cgroup.procs
xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite 0 4k" /dev/sdg
echo "`cat /sys/block/sdg/dev` target=1000000" > $P/io.latency
xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite 0 4k" /dev/sdg
This fixes the problem by freezing the queue so that while
enabling/disabling iolatency, there is no inflight rq running.
Note that quiesce_queue is not needed as this only updating iolatency
configuration about which dispatching request_queue doesn't care.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
block/blk-iolatency.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index fc714ef402a6..1893686a9c1f 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/loadavg.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
#include <trace/events/block.h>
+#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
#include "blk-rq-qos.h"
#include "blk-stat.h"
@@ -601,6 +602,9 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
return;
enabled = blk_iolatency_enabled(iolat->blkiolat);
+ if (!enabled)
+ return;
+
while (blkg && blkg->parent) {
iolat = blkg_to_lat(blkg);
if (!iolat) {
@@ -610,7 +614,7 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
rqw = &iolat->rq_wait;
atomic_dec(&rqw->inflight);
- if (!enabled || iolat->min_lat_nsec == 0)
+ if (iolat->min_lat_nsec == 0)
goto next;
iolatency_record_time(iolat, &bio->bi_issue, now,
issue_as_root);
@@ -754,10 +758,13 @@ int blk_iolatency_init(struct request_queue *q)
return 0;
}
-static void iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, u64 val)
+/*
+ * return 1 for enabling iolatency, return -1 for disabling iolatency, otherwise
+ * return 0.
+ */
+static int iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, u64 val)
{
struct iolatency_grp *iolat = blkg_to_lat(blkg);
- struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat = iolat->blkiolat;
u64 oldval = iolat->min_lat_nsec;
iolat->min_lat_nsec = val;
@@ -766,9 +773,10 @@ static void iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, u64 val)
BLKIOLATENCY_MAX_WIN_SIZE);
if (!oldval && val)
- atomic_inc(&blkiolat->enabled);
+ return 1;
if (oldval && !val)
- atomic_dec(&blkiolat->enabled);
+ return -1;
+ return 0;
}
static void iolatency_clear_scaling(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
@@ -800,6 +808,7 @@ static ssize_t iolatency_set_limit(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
u64 lat_val = 0;
u64 oldval;
int ret;
+ int enable = 0;
ret = blkg_conf_prep(blkcg, &blkcg_policy_iolatency, buf, &ctx);
if (ret)
@@ -834,7 +843,12 @@ static ssize_t iolatency_set_limit(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
blkg = ctx.blkg;
oldval = iolat->min_lat_nsec;
- iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(blkg, lat_val);
+ enable = iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(blkg, lat_val);
+ if (enable) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!blk_get_queue(blkg->q));
+ blkg_get(blkg);
+ }
+
if (oldval != iolat->min_lat_nsec) {
iolatency_clear_scaling(blkg);
}
@@ -842,6 +856,24 @@ static ssize_t iolatency_set_limit(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
ret = 0;
out:
blkg_conf_finish(&ctx);
+ if (ret == 0 && enable) {
+ struct iolatency_grp *tmp = blkg_to_lat(blkg);
+ struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat = tmp->blkiolat;
+
+ blk_mq_freeze_queue(blkg->q);
+
+ if (enable == 1)
+ atomic_inc(&blkiolat->enabled);
+ else if (enable == -1)
+ atomic_dec(&blkiolat->enabled);
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(blkg->q);
+
+ blkg_put(blkg);
+ blk_put_queue(blkg->q);
+ }
return ret ?: nbytes;
}
@@ -977,8 +1009,14 @@ static void iolatency_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
{
struct iolatency_grp *iolat = pd_to_lat(pd);
struct blkcg_gq *blkg = lat_to_blkg(iolat);
+ struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat = iolat->blkiolat;
+ int ret;
- iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(blkg, 0);
+ ret = iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(blkg, 0);
+ if (ret == 1)
+ atomic_inc(&blkiolat->enabled);
+ if (ret == -1)
+ atomic_dec(&blkiolat->enabled);
iolatency_clear_scaling(blkg);
}
--
2.20.1.2.gb21ebb6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/3] Blk-iolatency: warn on negative inflight IO counter
2019-01-25 0:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] iolatency bug fix Liu Bo
2019-01-25 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] blk-iolatency: fix IO hang due to negative inflight counter Liu Bo
@ 2019-01-25 0:12 ` Liu Bo
2019-01-25 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] blk-mq: remove duplicated definition of blk_mq_freeze_queue Liu Bo
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu Bo @ 2019-01-25 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block; +Cc: Josef Bacik, Jens Axboe
This is to catch any unexpected negative value of inflight IO counter.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
block/blk-iolatency.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index 1893686a9c1f..2620baa1f699 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
u64 now = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
bool issue_as_root = bio_issue_as_root_blkg(bio);
bool enabled = false;
+ int inflight = 0;
blkg = bio->bi_blkg;
if (!blkg || !bio_flagged(bio, BIO_TRACKED))
@@ -613,7 +614,8 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
}
rqw = &iolat->rq_wait;
- atomic_dec(&rqw->inflight);
+ inflight = atomic_dec_return(&rqw->inflight);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(inflight < 0);
if (iolat->min_lat_nsec == 0)
goto next;
iolatency_record_time(iolat, &bio->bi_issue, now,
--
2.20.1.2.gb21ebb6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread