From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 49/77] block: cover another queue enter recursion via BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:39:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190227173918.GL10616@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190215022807.GC21045@ming.t460p>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:28:08AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:08:27PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 698cef173983b086977e633e46476e0f925ca01e ]
>>
>> Except for blk_queue_split(), bio_split() is used for splitting bio too,
>> then the remained bio is often resubmit to queue via generic_make_request().
>> So the same queue enter recursion exits in this case too. Unfortunatley
>> commit cd4a4ae4683dc2 doesn't help this case.
>>
>> This patch covers the above case by setting BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED before calling
>> q->make_request_fn.
>>
>> In theory the per-bio flag is used to simulate one stack variable, it is
>> just fine to clear it after q->make_request_fn is returned. Especially
>> the same bio can't be submitted from another context.
>>
>> Fixes: cd4a4ae4683dc2 ("block: don't use blocking queue entered for recursive bio submits")
>> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
>> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> block/blk-merge.c | 10 ----------
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index deb56932f8c4..22260339f66f 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -2449,7 +2449,18 @@ blk_qc_t generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
>> /* Create a fresh bio_list for all subordinate requests */
>> bio_list_on_stack[1] = bio_list_on_stack[0];
>> bio_list_init(&bio_list_on_stack[0]);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Since we're recursing into make_request here, ensure
>> + * that we mark this bio as already having entered the queue.
>> + * If not, and the queue is going away, we can get stuck
>> + * forever on waiting for the queue reference to drop. But
>> + * that will never happen, as we're already holding a
>> + * reference to it.
>> + */
>> + bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED);
>> ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
>> + bio_clear_flag(bio, BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED);
>>
>> /* sort new bios into those for a lower level
>> * and those for the same level
>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>> index 7695034f4b87..adfe835ab258 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>> @@ -272,16 +272,6 @@ void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio)
>> /* there isn't chance to merge the splitted bio */
>> split->bi_opf |= REQ_NOMERGE;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Since we're recursing into make_request here, ensure
>> - * that we mark this bio as already having entered the queue.
>> - * If not, and the queue is going away, we can get stuck
>> - * forever on waiting for the queue reference to drop. But
>> - * that will never happen, as we're already holding a
>> - * reference to it.
>> - */
>> - bio_set_flag(*bio, BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED);
>> -
>> bio_chain(split, *bio);
>> trace_block_split(q, split, (*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>> generic_make_request(*bio);
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
>
>This one should be dropped, given it has been reverted.
Dropped, thank you.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190215020855.176727-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-02-15 2:08 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 49/77] block: cover another queue enter recursion via BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED Sasha Levin
2019-02-15 2:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-02-15 2:28 ` Ming Lei
2019-02-27 17:39 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-02-15 2:08 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 77/77] Revert "block: cover another queue enter recursion via BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED" Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190227173918.GL10616@sasha-vm \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox