From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nvme/pci: Remove queue IO flushing hack
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:37:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190311193753.GE10411@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190311184031.GA11707@lst.de>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From a quick look the code seems reasonably sensible here,
> but any chance we could have this in common code?
>
> > +static bool nvme_fail_queue_request(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved)
> > +{
> > + struct nvme_iod *iod = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> > + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = iod->nvmeq;
> > +
> > + if (!test_bit(NVMEQ_ENABLED, &nvmeq->flags))
> > + blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> > + return true;
> > +}
>
> The only thing not purely block layer here is the enabled flag.
> So if we had a per-hctx enabled flag we could lift this out of nvme,
> and hopefully start reusing it in other drivers.
Okay, I may even be able to drop the new block exports if we do request
termination in generic block layer. That's probably the right thing
anyway since that layer is in a better position to check the necessary
conditions that make tag iteration safe. Bart did point out that is
generally not safe for drives to do, so it'd be good to safegaurd against
incorrect usage.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-08 17:40 [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: Export reading mq request state Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: Export iterating queue requests Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 18:13 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: Iterate tagset over all requests Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: Fail dead namespace's entered requests Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 18:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 21:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 22:06 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-11 3:58 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-11 15:42 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme/pci: Remove queue IO flushing hack Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-11 18:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-11 19:37 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-03-27 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-27 13:21 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-28 1:42 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-28 3:33 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: Export reading mq request state Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 18:15 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 19:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 20:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 21:14 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 21:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 21:31 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 20:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-08 20:29 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190311193753.GE10411@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox