From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_complete_request_sync()
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:28:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319042803.GD22459@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb036f6f-3dd5-cf7b-4811-6c7d97a2279e@broadcom.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:04:37PM -0700, James Smart wrote:
>
>
> On 3/18/2019 6:31 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:37:08AM -0700, James Smart wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/17/2019 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > In NVMe's error handler, follows the typical steps for tearing down
> > > > hardware:
> > > >
> > > > 1) stop blk_mq hw queues
> > > > 2) stop the real hw queues
> > > > 3) cancel in-flight requests via
> > > > blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(tags, cancel_request, ...)
> > > > cancel_request():
> > > > mark the request as abort
> > > > blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> > > > 4) destroy real hw queues
> > > >
> > > > However, there may be race between #3 and #4, because blk_mq_complete_request()
> > > > actually completes the request asynchronously.
> > > >
> > > > This patch introduces blk_mq_complete_request_sync() for fixing the
> > > > above race.
> > > >
> > > This won't help FC at all. Inherently, the "completion" has to be
> > > asynchronous as line traffic may be required.
> > >
> > > e.g. FC doesn't use nvme_complete_request() in the iterator routine.
> > >
> > Looks FC has done the sync already, see nvme_fc_delete_association():
> >
> > ...
> > /* wait for all io that had to be aborted */
> > spin_lock_irq(&ctrl->lock);
> > wait_event_lock_irq(ctrl->ioabort_wait, ctrl->iocnt == 0, ctrl->lock);
> > ctrl->flags &= ~FCCTRL_TERMIO;
> > spin_unlock_irq(&ctrl->lock);
>
> yes - but the iterator started a lot of the back end io terminating in
> parallel. So waiting on many happening in parallel is better than waiting 1
> at a time.
OK, that is FC's sync, not related with this patch.
> Even so, I've always disliked this wait and would have
> preferred to exit the thread with something monitoring the completions
> re-queuing a work thread to finish.
Then I guess you may like this patch given it actually avoids the
potential wait, :-)
What the patch does is to convert the remote completion(#1) into local
completion(#2):
1) previously one request may be completed remotely by blk_mq_complete_request():
rq->csd.func = __blk_mq_complete_request_remote;
rq->csd.info = rq;
rq->csd.flags = 0;
smp_call_function_single_async(ctx->cpu, &rq->csd);
2) this patch changes the remote completion into local completion via
blk_mq_complete_request_sync(), so all in-flight requests can be aborted
before destroying queue.
q->mq_ops->complete(rq);
As I mentioned in another email, there isn't any waiting for aborting
request, nvme_cancel_request() simply requeues the request to blk-mq
under this situation.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 3:29 [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq/nvme: cancel request synchronously Ming Lei
2019-03-18 3:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_complete_request_sync() Ming Lei
2019-03-18 4:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 7:38 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-18 15:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 15:16 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-18 15:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 16:06 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-21 0:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-21 1:39 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-21 2:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-21 2:32 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-21 21:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-27 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 2:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-21 2:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-18 14:40 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-18 17:30 ` James Smart
2019-03-18 17:37 ` James Smart
2019-03-19 1:06 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-19 3:37 ` James Smart
2019-03-19 3:50 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-19 1:31 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-19 4:04 ` James Smart
2019-03-19 4:28 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-03-27 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-18 3:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: cancel request synchronously Ming Lei
2019-03-27 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-27 2:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq/nvme: " Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190319042803.GD22459@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).