linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nvme/pci: Remove queue IO flushing hack
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:31:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327083142.GQ20525@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190311193753.GE10411@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:37:53PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The only thing not purely block layer here is the enabled flag.
> > So if we had a per-hctx enabled flag we could lift this out of nvme,
> > and hopefully start reusing it in other drivers.
> 
> Okay, I may even be able to drop the new block exports if we do request
> termination in generic block layer. That's probably the right thing
> anyway since that layer is in a better position to check the necessary
> conditions that make tag iteration safe. Bart did point out that is
> generally not safe for drives to do, so it'd be good to safegaurd against
> incorrect usage.

Did you get a chance to look into this?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-08 17:40 [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: Export reading mq request state Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: Export iterating queue requests Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:08   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 18:13     ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: Iterate tagset over all requests Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: Fail dead namespace's entered requests Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:15   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 18:19     ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 21:54       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 22:06         ` Keith Busch
2019-03-11  3:58   ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-11 15:42     ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme/pci: Remove queue IO flushing hack Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:19   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-11 18:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-11 19:37     ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27  8:31       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-03-27 13:21         ` Keith Busch
2019-03-28  1:42           ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-28  3:33             ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: Export reading mq request state Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 18:15   ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 18:42     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 19:19       ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 20:47         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 21:14           ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 21:25             ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-08 21:31               ` Keith Busch
2019-03-08 20:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-03-08 20:29   ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190327083142.GQ20525@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).