From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5B7C43381 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967592183F for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728857AbfC2HIa (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:08:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34298 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728781AbfC2HIa (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:08:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E0486677; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-8-16.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ED65C29A; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:08:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei , Omar Sandoval , Christoph Hellwig Subject: [PATCH V3 03/10] block: don't merge adjacent bvecs to one segment in bio blk_queue_split Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:07:56 +0800 Message-Id: <20190329070803.10958-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190329070803.10958-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20190329070803.10958-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org For normal filesystem IO, each page is added via blk_add_page(), in which bvec(page) merge has been handled already, and basically not possible to merge two adjacent bvecs in one bio. So not try to merge two adjacent bvecs in blk_queue_split(). Cc: Omar Sandoval Cc: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- block/blk-merge.c | 17 ----------------- 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 1c9d4f0f96ea..aa9164eb7187 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -267,23 +267,6 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, goto split; } - if (bvprvp) { - if (seg_size + bv.bv_len > queue_max_segment_size(q)) - goto new_segment; - if (!biovec_phys_mergeable(q, bvprvp, &bv)) - goto new_segment; - - seg_size += bv.bv_len; - bvprv = bv; - bvprvp = &bvprv; - sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9; - - if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) - front_seg_size = seg_size; - - continue; - } -new_segment: if (nsegs == max_segs) goto split; -- 2.9.5