public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue()
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:38:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402003842.GA21944@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554131699.118779.119.camel@acm.org>

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:14:59AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 12:42 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Now freeing hw queue resource is moved to hctx's release handler,
> > we don't need to worry about the race between blk_cleanup_queue and
> > run queue any more.
> > 
> > So don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue().
> > 
> > This is basically revert of c2856ae2f315 ("blk-mq: quiesce queue before
> > freeing queue").
> > 
> > Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> > Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> > Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
> > Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
> > Cc: James E . J . Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> > Cc: jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-core.c | 12 ------------
> >  1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index b3bbf8a5110d..491dc0295778 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -347,18 +347,6 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> >  
> >         blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, q);
> >  
> > -       /*
> > -        * make sure all in-progress dispatch are completed because
> > -        * blk_freeze_queue() can only complete all requests, and
> > -        * dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests
> > -        * from more than one contexts.
> > -        *
> > -        * We rely on driver to deal with the race in case that queue
> > -        * initialization isn't done.
> > -        */
> > -       if (queue_is_mq(q) && blk_queue_init_done(q))
> > -               blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
> > -
> >         /* for synchronous bio-based driver finish in-flight integrity i/o */
> >         blk_flush_integrity();
> 
> Many block drivers clean up resources immediately after blk_cleanup_queue()
> returns. Not waiting for ongoing .queue_rq() calls to finish is wrong because
> it can cause block drivers to destroy resources that are in use by a concurrent
> .queue_rq() call.

blk_freeze_queue() has returned, so there can't be any in-flight IOs and .queue_rq(),
but there might be run queue activities, which do not call into driver.


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01  4:42 [PATCH V2 0/3] blk-mq: allow to run queue if queue refcount is held Ming Lei
2019-04-01  4:42 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-01  4:42 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-01 15:14   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-02  0:38     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-01  4:42 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] SCSI: don't grab queue usage counter before run queue Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190402003842.GA21944@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox