From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] block: fix build warning in merging bvecs
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:26:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402022644.7812-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
Commit f6970f83ef79 ("block: don't check if adjacent bvecs in one bio can
be mergeable") changes bvec merge by only considering two bvecs from
different bios. However, if the former bio doesn't inlcude any io bvec,
then the following warning may be triggered:
warning: ‘bvec.bv_offset’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
In practice, it shouldn't be triggered.
Fixes it by adding check on former bio, the check shouldn't add any cost
given 'bio->bi_iter' can be hit in cache.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Fixes: f6970f83ef79 ("block: don't check if adjacent bvecs in one bio can be mergeable")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-merge.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 8f96d683b577..895795cdb145 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_split);
static unsigned int __blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request_queue *q,
struct bio *bio)
{
- struct bio_vec bv, bvprv = { NULL };
+ struct bio_vec uninitialized_var(bv), bvprv = { NULL };
unsigned int seg_size, nr_phys_segs;
unsigned front_seg_size;
struct bio *fbio, *bbio;
@@ -400,8 +400,10 @@ static unsigned int __blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request_queue *q,
new_bio = false;
}
bbio = bio;
- bvprv = bv;
- new_bio = true;
+ if (likely(bio->bi_iter.bi_size)) {
+ bvprv = bv;
+ new_bio = true;
+ }
}
fbio->bi_seg_front_size = front_seg_size;
@@ -527,7 +529,7 @@ static int __blk_bios_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
struct scatterlist *sglist,
struct scatterlist **sg)
{
- struct bio_vec bvec, bvprv = { NULL };
+ struct bio_vec uninitialized_var(bvec), bvprv = { NULL };
struct bvec_iter iter;
int nsegs = 0;
bool new_bio = false;
@@ -550,8 +552,10 @@ static int __blk_bios_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
next_bvec:
new_bio = false;
}
- bvprv = bvec;
- new_bio = true;
+ if (likely(bio->bi_iter.bi_size)) {
+ bvprv = bvec;
+ new_bio = true;
+ }
}
return nsegs;
--
2.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 2:26 Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-08 16:57 ` [PATCH V2] block: fix build warning in merging bvecs Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402022644.7812-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).