From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for sg list
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:53:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424055317.GF12136@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423103240.29864-3-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 06:32:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> big, the whole pre-allocation for sg list can consume huge memory.
> For example of lpfc, nr_hw_queues can be 70, each queue's depth
> can be 3781, so the pre-allocation for data sg list can be 70*3781*2k
> =517MB for single HBA.
We should probably limit the number of queues to something actually
useful, independent of your patch..
> +static bool scsi_use_inline_sg(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct scatterlist *sg = (void *)cmd + sizeof(struct scsi_cmnd) +
> + cmd->device->host->hostt->cmd_size;
> +
> + return cmd->sdb.table.sgl == sg;
> +}
It might make more sense to have a helper to calculate the inline
sg address and use that for the comparism in scsi_mq_free_sgtables
and any other place that wants the address.
> + if (cmd->sdb.table.nents && !scsi_use_inline_sg(cmd))
> + sg_free_table_chained(&cmd->sdb.table, false);
This removes the last use of the first_chunk paramter to
sg_free_table_chained, please remove the paramter in an additional
patch.
> + if (nr_segs <= SCSI_INLINE_SG_CNT)
> + sdb->table.nents = sdb->table.orig_nents =
> + SCSI_INLINE_SG_CNT;
Don't we need a sg_init_table here?
> + else if (unlikely(sg_alloc_table_chained(&sdb->table, nr_segs,
> + NULL)))
> return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
We should probably also be able to drop the last parameter to
sg_alloc_table_chained now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-23 10:32 [PATCH 0/2] scis: core: avoid big pre-allocation for sg list Ming Lei
2019-04-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for protection meta data Ming Lei
2019-04-23 15:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-24 0:46 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for sg list Ming Lei
2019-04-23 15:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-24 7:52 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2019-04-24 15:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-24 15:37 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-24 15:49 ` James Bottomley
2019-04-24 16:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-24 16:17 ` James Bottomley
2019-04-24 5:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-04-24 8:41 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 0:45 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424055317.GF12136@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).