linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:45:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426224542.GD31470@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426151114.GB20438@lst.de>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:11:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:00:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > The issue is driver(NVMe) specific, the race window is just between
> > between blk_cleanup_queue() and removing the ns from the controller namspace
> > list in nvme_ns_remove()
> 
> And I wouldn't be surprised if others have the same issue.

SCSI hasn't such issue, and loop/null/virtio-blk doesn't too.

> 
> > 
> > blk_mq_init_queue() does hold one refcount, and its counter-part is
> > blk_cleanup_queue().
> > 
> > It is simply ugly to ask blk_mq_init_queue() to grab a refcnt for driver,
> > then who is the counter-part for releasing the extra refcount?
> 
> Well, the problem is exactly that blk_cleanup_queue drops the reference.
> If move the blk_put_queue() call from the end of it to the callers the
> callers can keep the reference as long as they need them, and we wouldn't
> need an extra reference.

It depends on driver.

Still no difference between your suggestion and the way in this patch, given
driver specific change is a must. Even it is more clean to hold the
queue refocunt by drivers explicitly because we usually do the get/put pair
in one place, instead that getting refcnt in one subsystem, and doing put in
another place.

I am going to drop this patch in V8 since my original plan is to fix block
layer's race in this patchset.


Thanks,
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-26 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-24 11:02 [PATCH V7 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  0:53     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25  5:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  7:35         ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] blk-mq: move all hctx alloction & initialization into __blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  0:55     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 15:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  1:02     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] blk-mq: split blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx into two parts Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  1:00     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 15:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26 17:04         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-26 22:49           ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 22:45         ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-27  5:54           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190426224542.GD31470@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).