linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:49:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426224919.GE31470@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556298263.161891.152.camel@acm.org>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:04:23AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 17:11 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:00:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > The issue is driver(NVMe) specific, the race window is just between
> > > between blk_cleanup_queue() and removing the ns from the controller namspace
> > > list in nvme_ns_remove()
> > 
> > And I wouldn't be surprised if others have the same issue.
> > 
> > > 
> > > blk_mq_init_queue() does hold one refcount, and its counter-part is
> > > blk_cleanup_queue().
> > > 
> > > It is simply ugly to ask blk_mq_init_queue() to grab a refcnt for driver,
> > > then who is the counter-part for releasing the extra refcount?
> > 
> > Well, the problem is exactly that blk_cleanup_queue drops the reference.
> > If move the blk_put_queue() call from the end of it to the callers the
> > callers can keep the reference as long as they need them, and we wouldn't
> > need an extra reference.
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> There are more than hundred callers of blk_cleanup_queue() so that change
> would cause a lot of churn. Since blk_get_queue() and blk_put_queue() are
> available, how inserting a pair of calls to these functions where necessary?

The problem is that queue might be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is
returned by some drivers.

Gendisk is removed before cleanup queue, and the other activities on queue
depends on driver itself. There can't be universal way to deal with that.

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-26 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-24 11:02 [PATCH V7 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  0:53     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25  5:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  7:35         ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] blk-mq: move all hctx alloction & initialization into __blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  0:55     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 15:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  1:02     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] blk-mq: split blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx into two parts Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25  1:00     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 15:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26 17:04         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-26 22:49           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-26 22:45         ` Ming Lei
2019-04-27  5:54           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190426224919.GE31470@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).