From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: avoid page allocation warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:59:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430145938.GA8314@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430141810.GF13796@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 07:18:10AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:24:05PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > In io_sqe_buffer_register() we allocate a number of arrays based on the
> > iov_len from the user-provided iov. While we limit iov_len to SZ_1G,
> > we can still attempt to allocate arrays exceeding MAX_ORDER.
> >
> > On a 64-bit system with 4KiB pages, for an iov where iov_base = 0x10 and
> > iov_len = SZ_1G, we'll calculate that nr_pages = 262145. When we try to
> > allocate a corresponding array of (16-byte) bio_vecs, requiring 4194320
> > bytes, which is greater than 4MiB. This results in SLUB warning that
> > we're trying to allocate greater than MAX_ORDER, and failing the
> > allocation.
> >
> > Avoid this by passing __GFP_NOWARN when allocating arrays for the
> > user-provided iov_len. We'll gracefully handle the failed allocation,
> > returning -ENOMEM to userspace.
> >
> > We should probably consider lowering the limit below SZ_1G, or reworking
> > the array allocations.
>
> I'd suggest that kvmalloc is probably our friend here ... we don't really
> want to return -ENOMEM to userspace for this case, I don't think.
Sure. I'll go verify that the uring code doesn't assume this memory is
physically contiguous.
I also guess we should be passing GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT rateh than a plain
GFP_KERNEL.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 13:24 [PATCH] io_uring: avoid page allocation warnings Mark Rutland
2019-04-30 14:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-30 14:59 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-04-30 16:21 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-30 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-30 18:11 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 10:30 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-01 12:41 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 15:09 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-01 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 15:55 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430145938.GA8314@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).