From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:28:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522202805.GA5781@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <721e059e-ed88-734c-fea2-3637e6d31f4c@acm.org>
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:20:45PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/22/19 7:48 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Hardware may temporarily stop processing commands that have
> > been dispatched to it while activating new firmware. Some target
> > implementation's paused state time exceeds the default request expiry,
> > so any request dispatched before the driver could quiesce for the
> > hardware's paused state will time out, and handling this may interrupt
> > the firmware activation.
> >
> > This two-part series provides a way for drivers to reset dispatched
> > requests' timeout deadline, then uses this new mechanism from the nvme
> > driver's fw activation work.
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> Is it essential to modify the block layer to implement this behavior
> change? Would it be possible to implement this behavior change by
> modifying the NVMe driver only, e.g. by modifying the nvme_timeout()
> function and by making that function return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER while new
> firmware is being activated?
Good question.
We can't just do this from nvme_timeout(), though. That introduces races
between timeout_work and fw_act_work if that fw work clears the
condition that timeout needs to observe to return RESET_TIMER.
Even if we avoid that race, the rq->deadline needs to be adjusted to
the current time after the h/w unpause because the time accumulated while
h/w halted itself should not be counted against the request.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-22 17:48 [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: provide way to reset rq deadline Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: reset request timeouts during fw activation Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:19 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-23 13:34 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware Bart Van Assche
2019-05-22 20:28 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-05-23 10:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-23 3:29 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-23 3:48 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 13:23 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 14:19 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190522202805.GA5781@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox