public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 10:28:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190529022852.GA21398@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45daceb4-fb88-a835-8cc6-cd4c4d7cf42d@huawei.com>

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:50:40PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/05/2019 16:02, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Managed interrupts can not migrate affinity when their CPUs are offline.
> > If the CPU is allowed to shutdown before they're returned, commands
> > dispatched to managed queues won't be able to complete through their
> > irq handlers.
> > 
> > Wait in cpu hotplug handler until all inflight requests on the tags
> > are completed or timeout. Wait once for each tags, so we can save time
> > in case of shared tags.
> > 
> > Based on the following patch from Keith, and use simple delay-spin
> > instead.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190405215920.27085-1-keith.busch@intel.com/
> > 
> > Some SCSI devices may have single blk_mq hw queue and multiple private
> > completion queues, and wait until all requests on the private completion
> > queue are completed.
> 
> Hi Ming,
> 
> I'm a bit concerned that this approach won't work due to ordering: it seems
> that the IRQ would be shutdown prior to the CPU dead notification for the

Managed IRQ shutdown is run in irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu(), which is
called in the callback of takedown_cpu(). And the CPU dead notification
is always sent after that CPU becomes offline, see cpuhp_invoke_callback().

> last CPU in the mask (where we attempt to drain the queue associated with
> the IRQ, which would require the IRQ to be still enabled).
> 
> I hope that you can tell me that I'm wrong...

Or you add one line printk in both irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() and
blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(), you will see if you are wrong.


Thanks, 
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-29  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27 15:02 [PATCH V2 0/5] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] scsi: select reply queue from request's CPU Ming Lei
2019-05-28  5:43   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-05-28 10:33   ` John Garry
2019-05-29  2:36     ` Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] blk-mq: introduce .complete_queue_affinity Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] scsi: core: implement callback of .complete_queue_affinity Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] scsi: implement .complete_queue_affinity Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug Ming Lei
2019-05-28 16:50   ` John Garry
2019-05-29  2:28     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-05-29  2:42       ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29  9:42         ` John Garry
2019-05-29 10:10           ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29 15:33             ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29 16:10               ` John Garry
2019-05-30  2:28                 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-30  4:11                   ` Ming Lei
2019-05-30  9:31                   ` John Garry
2019-05-30  9:45                     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190529022852.GA21398@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox