From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391FEC31E4A for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD6620851 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732177AbfFMPxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:53:18 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36784 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731618AbfFMJD0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:03:26 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B695568B02; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:02:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:02:57 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Ming Lei , Christoph Hellwig , David Gibson , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: alternative take on the same page merging leak fix Message-ID: <20190613090257.GA13708@lst.de> References: <20190611151007.13625-1-hch@lst.de> <20190612010922.GA17522@ming.t460p> <20190612074527.GA20491@lst.de> <20190612101111.GA16000@ming.t460p> <5d781312-d28e-5bcc-4294-27facdd4a1e7@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d781312-d28e-5bcc-4294-27facdd4a1e7@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:02:10AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> Patches 3 and 4 have no dependencies on 1 and 2, and should have > >> arguably been ordered first in the series. > > > > OK, that is good to make patch 3 &4 into 5.2, I will give a review > > soon. > > I'll echo Mings sentiments here, for the series. And what does that actually mean? Do you want me to just resend 3 and 4, or can you just pick them up?