From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] block: Allow mapping of vmalloc-ed buffers
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:28:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627072800.GA9949@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627024910.23987-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> +#ifdef ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_KERNEL_DCACHE_PAGE
That seems like an odd constructu, as you don't call
flush_kernel_dcache_page. From looking whoe defines it it seems
to be about the right set of architectures, but that might be
by a mix of chance and similar requirements for cache flushing.
> +static void bio_invalidate_vmalloc_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + if (bio->bi_private) {
> + struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
> + struct bio_vec *bvec;
> + unsigned long len = 0;
> +
> + bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all)
> + len += bvec->bv_len;
> + invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(bio->bi_private, len);
We control the bio here, so we can directly iterate over the
segments instead of doing the fairly expensive bio_for_each_segment_all
call that goes to each page and builds a bvec for it.
> + struct page *page;
> int offset, i;
> struct bio *bio;
>
> @@ -1508,6 +1529,12 @@ struct bio *bio_map_kern(struct request_queue *q, void *data, unsigned int len,
> if (!bio)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> + if (is_vmalloc) {
> + flush_kernel_vmap_range(data, len);
> + if ((!op_is_write(bio_op(bio))))
> + bio->bi_private = data;
> + }
We've just allocate the bio, so bio->bi_opf is not actually set at
this point unfortunately.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-27 2:49 [PATCH V4 0/3] Fix zone revalidation memory allocation failures Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 2:49 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] block: Allow mapping of vmalloc-ed buffers Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-06-27 8:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 8:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 7:47 ` Ming Lei
2019-06-27 8:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 8:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 2:49 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] sd_zbc: Fix report zones buffer allocation Damien Le Moal
2019-06-27 2:49 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] block: Limit zone array allocation size Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627072800.GA9949@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox