From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] scis: don't apply per-LUN queue depth for SSD
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 18:31:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191118103117.978-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
SCSI's per-LUN queue depth is usually for improving IO merge and
balancing IO load among LUNs. blk-mq has provides fair driver tag
allocation and managed IRQ balances interrupt load among queues,
meantime IO merge doesn't play a big role for SSD, and NVMe doesn't
apply per-namespace queue depth.
This patchset tries to don't apply per-LUN queue depth for SSD, then
we can avoid the expensive atomic operation on sdev->device_busy.
We do understand that this shared counter affects IOPS a lot.
The 1st two patches replaces .device_busy with two private counter for
megaraid_sas and mpt3sas to track inflight per-LUN commands since the
two drivers need the counter for balancing load, even though it is
probably no much use.
The last two patches avoid to operate on sdev->device_busy in IO path
for SSD.
Ming Lei (4):
scsi: megaraid_sas: use private counter for tracking inflight per-LUN
commands
scsi: mpt3sas: use private counter for tracking inflight per-LUN
commands
scsi: sd: register request queue after sd_revalidate_disk is done
scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD
block/blk-sysfs.c | 14 +++++++++++-
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 1 +
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 15 +++++++++++--
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 13 +++++++----
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 3 ++-
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.h | 1 +
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 15 +++++++++++--
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 24 +++++++++++++++------
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 8 ++++++-
9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Cc: Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>
Cc: Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>
Cc: Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Cc: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
Cc: Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>
Cc: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-18 10:31 Ming Lei [this message]
2019-11-18 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi: megaraid_sas: use private counter for tracking inflight per-LUN commands Ming Lei
2019-11-20 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-26 3:12 ` Kashyap Desai
2019-11-26 3:37 ` Ming Lei
2019-12-05 10:32 ` Kashyap Desai
2019-11-18 10:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: mpt3sas: " Ming Lei
2019-11-20 9:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-18 10:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: sd: register request queue after sd_revalidate_disk is done Ming Lei
2019-11-20 9:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-18 10:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD Ming Lei
2019-11-20 10:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-20 17:00 ` Ewan D. Milne
2019-11-20 20:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-20 21:36 ` Ewan D. Milne
2019-11-22 2:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-11-21 1:07 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-22 2:59 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-11-22 3:24 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-22 16:38 ` Sumanesh Samanta
2019-11-21 0:54 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-21 19:19 ` Ewan D. Milne
2019-11-21 0:53 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-21 15:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-22 8:09 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-22 18:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-22 18:26 ` James Smart
2019-11-22 20:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-22 22:04 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-22 22:00 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-25 18:28 ` Ewan D. Milne
2019-11-25 22:14 ` James Smart
2019-11-22 2:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191118103117.978-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).