From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900E7C432C3 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 16:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E27820835 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 16:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727754AbfKZQnB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:43:01 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41638 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727532AbfKZQnB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:43:01 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D81B068C4E; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:42:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:42:58 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Ming Lei , Bart van Assche , John Garry , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: Use a pointer for sbitmap Message-ID: <20191126164258.GA8108@lst.de> References: <20191126131009.71726-1-hare@suse.de> <20191126131009.71726-4-hare@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191126131009.71726-4-hare@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Instead of allocating the tag bitmap in place we should be using a > pointer. This is in preparation for shared host-wide bitmaps. We should is a rather vague statement that needs to be followed up by an actual reason.