From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C440C432C0 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8272070A for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726350AbfLCPmy (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:42:54 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44298 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726298AbfLCPmy (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:42:54 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6CFB868BFE; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:42:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:42:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Damien Le Moal , Hans Holmberg , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] block: set the zone size in blk_revalidate_disk_zones atomically Message-ID: <20191203154251.GA928@lst.de> References: <20191203151808.GA558@lst.de> <8FC173FA-576A-4425-AAE4-EE2A27C5F6BE@javigon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8FC173FA-576A-4425-AAE4-EE2A27C5F6BE@javigon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 04:34:08PM +0100, Javier González wrote: > Agree on the BUG_ON part. But since you’re looking into this part now, would it make sense to do the check in the block layer only if the driver imposes a power of two? We can also do it down the road, but seems like double work. The whole block layer chunk / zone handling has always assumed power of two zone sizes. Changing that would introduce expensive divisions in the fast path. This patch just moves the check to where it belongs.