From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, John Pittman <jpittman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: only queue kyber's wait callback if not already active
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:41:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219214142.GB826140@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191217160024.GA23066@redhat>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:00:24AM -0500, David Jeffery wrote:
> Under heavy loads where the kyber I/O scheduler hits the token limits for
> its scheduling domains, kyber can become stuck. When active requests
> complete, kyber may not be woken up leaving the I/O requests in kyber
> stuck.
>
> This stuck state is due to a race condition with kyber and the sbitmap
> functions it uses to run a callback when enough requests have completed.
> The running of a sbt_wait callback can race with the attempt to insert the
> sbt_wait. Since sbitmap_del_wait_queue removes the sbt_wait from the list
> first then sets the sbq field to NULL, kyber can see the item as not on a
> list but the call to sbitmap_add_wait_queue will see sbq as non-NULL. This
> results in the sbt_wait being inserted onto the wait list but ws_active
> doesn't get incremented. So the sbitmap queue does not know there is a
> waiter on a wait list.
>
> Since sbitmap doesn't think there is a waiter, kyber may never be
> informed that there are domain tokens available and the I/O never advances.
> With the sbt_wait on a wait list, kyber believes it has an active waiter
> so cannot insert a new waiter when reaching the domain's full state.
>
> This race can be fixed by only adding the sbt_wait to the queue if the
> sbq field is NULL. If sbq is not NULL, there is already an action active
> which will trigger the re-running of kyber. Let it run and add the
> sbt_wait to the wait list if still needing to wait.
So the race here is:
Thread 1 Thread 2
kyber_domain_wake
sbitmap_del_wait_queue
list_del_init
atomic_dec sbq->ws_active
kyber_get_domain_token
list_empty_careful
sbitmap_add_wait_queue
if (!sqb_wait->sb) // false
add_wait_queue
sbq_wait->sbq = NULL
Now sbq_wait->sbq == NULL, sbq->ws_active = 0, and
!list_empty(domain_wait), so sbq_wake_ptr returns NULL and
sbitmap_queue_wake_up does nothing.
I get the feeling that sbitmap_{add,del}_wait_queue need some memory
barriers... But ignoring that, this fix seems right.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
P.S. s/sbt_wait/sbq_wait/g in the commit message.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-17 16:00 [PATCH] sbitmap: only queue kyber's wait callback if not already active David Jeffery
2019-12-18 1:14 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-19 21:41 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191219214142.GB826140@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=jpittman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox