From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
To: <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
<houtao1@huawei.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
<zhengchuan@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: cache index instead of part self to avoid use-after-free
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 15:35:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200106073510.10825-1-yuyufen@huawei.com> (raw)
When delete partition executes concurrently with IOs issue,
it may cause use-after-free on part in disk_map_sector_rcu()
as following:
blk_account_io_start(req1) delete_partition blk_account_io_start(req2)
rcu_read_lock()
disk_map_sector_rcu
part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[4])
rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[4], NULL);
rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, part);
hd_struct_kill(part)
!hd_struct_try_get
part = &rq->rq_disk->part0;
rcu_read_unlock()
__delete_partition
call_rcu
rcu_read_lock
disk_map_sector_rcu
part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->last_lookup);
delete_partition_work_fn
free(part)
hd_struct_try_get(part)
BUG_ON use-after-free
req1 try to get 'ptbl->part[4]', while the part is beening
deleted. Although the delete_partition() will set last_lookup
as NULL, req1 can overwrite it as 'part[4]' again.
After calling call_rcu() and free() for the part, req2 can
access the part by last_lookup, resulting in use after free.
In fact, this bug has been reported by syzbot:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/4/357
To fix the bug, we try to cache index of part[] instead of
part[i] itself in last_lookup. Even if the index may been
re-assign, others can either get part[i] as value of NULL,
or get the new allocated part[i] after call_rcu. Both of
them is okay.
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
---
block/genhd.c | 15 +++++++++------
block/partition-generic.c | 2 +-
include/linux/genhd.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index ff6268970ddc..97447281a4f5 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -282,18 +282,21 @@ struct hd_struct *disk_map_sector_rcu(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
struct disk_part_tbl *ptbl;
struct hd_struct *part;
int i;
+ int last_lookup;
ptbl = rcu_dereference(disk->part_tbl);
-
- part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->last_lookup);
- if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector))
- return part;
+ last_lookup = READ_ONCE(ptbl->last_lookup);
+ if (last_lookup > 0 && last_lookup < ptbl->len) {
+ part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[last_lookup]);
+ if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector))
+ return part;
+ }
for (i = 1; i < ptbl->len; i++) {
part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[i]);
if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector)) {
- rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, part);
+ WRITE_ONCE(ptbl->last_lookup, i);
return part;
}
}
@@ -1263,7 +1266,7 @@ static void disk_replace_part_tbl(struct gendisk *disk,
rcu_assign_pointer(disk->part_tbl, new_ptbl);
if (old_ptbl) {
- rcu_assign_pointer(old_ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(old_ptbl->last_lookup, 0);
kfree_rcu(old_ptbl, rcu_head);
}
}
diff --git a/block/partition-generic.c b/block/partition-generic.c
index 1d20c9cf213f..a9fd24ae3acb 100644
--- a/block/partition-generic.c
+++ b/block/partition-generic.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
return;
rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
- rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(ptbl->last_lookup, 0);
kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
device_del(part_to_dev(part));
diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
index 8bb63027e4d6..9be4fb8f8b8b 100644
--- a/include/linux/genhd.h
+++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
@@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ enum {
struct disk_part_tbl {
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
int len;
- struct hd_struct __rcu *last_lookup;
+ /* Cache last lookup part[] index */
+ int last_lookup;
struct hd_struct __rcu *part[];
};
--
2.17.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-06 7:35 Yufen Yu [this message]
2020-01-08 15:01 ` [PATCH] block: cache index instead of part self to avoid use-after-free Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09 1:35 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200106073510.10825-1-yuyufen@huawei.com \
--to=yuyufen@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengchuan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox