public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler in case of inactive hctx
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:44:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115114409.28895-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115114409.28895-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

If one hctx becomes inactive when its CPUs are all offline, all in-queue
requests aimed at this hctx have to be re-submitted.

Re-submit requests from both sw queue or scheduler queue when the hctx
is found as inactive.

Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 3e52ba74661e..93c835312d42 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2311,6 +2311,42 @@ static void blk_mq_resubmit_io(struct request *rq)
 	}
 }
 
+static void blk_mq_hctx_deactivate(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(sched_tmp);
+	LIST_HEAD(re_submit);
+	struct request *rq;
+	struct elevator_queue *e = hctx->queue->elevator;
+
+	if (!e) {
+		blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &re_submit);
+	} else {
+		while ((rq = e->type->ops.dispatch_request(hctx))) {
+			if (rq->mq_hctx != hctx)
+				list_add(&rq->queuelist, &sched_tmp);
+			else
+				list_add(&rq->queuelist, &re_submit);
+		}
+	}
+	while (!list_empty(&sched_tmp)) {
+		rq = list_entry(sched_tmp.next, struct request,
+				queuelist);
+		list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
+		blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, true, true, true);
+	}
+
+	/* requests in dispatch list has to be re-submitted too */
+	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
+	list_splice_tail_init(&hctx->dispatch, &re_submit);
+	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
+
+	while (!list_empty(&re_submit)) {
+		rq = list_entry(re_submit.next, struct request, queuelist);
+		list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
+		blk_mq_resubmit_io(rq);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * 'cpu' has gone away. If this hctx is inactive, we can't dispatch request
  * to the hctx any more, so steal bios from requests of this hctx, and
@@ -2318,42 +2354,30 @@ static void blk_mq_resubmit_io(struct request *rq)
  */
 static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 {
-	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
-	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
-	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
-	enum hctx_type type;
-
-	hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_dead);
-	ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, cpu);
-	type = hctx->type;
+	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node,
+			struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_dead);
 
-	spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-	if (!list_empty(&ctx->rq_lists[type])) {
-		list_splice_init(&ctx->rq_lists[type], &tmp);
-		blk_mq_hctx_clear_pending(hctx, ctx);
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+	if (test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE, &hctx->state)) {
+		blk_mq_hctx_deactivate(hctx);
+		clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE, &hctx->state);
+	} else if (!hctx->queue->elevator) {
+		struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, cpu);
+		enum hctx_type type = hctx->type;
+		LIST_HEAD(tmp);
+
+		spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+		if (!list_empty(&ctx->rq_lists[type])) {
+			list_splice_init(&ctx->rq_lists[type], &tmp);
+			blk_mq_hctx_clear_pending(hctx, ctx);
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 
-	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE, &hctx->state)) {
 		if (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
 			spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
 			list_splice_tail_init(&tmp, &hctx->dispatch);
 			spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 			blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
 		}
-	} else {
-		/* requests in dispatch list has to be re-submitted too */
-		spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-		list_splice_tail_init(&hctx->dispatch, &tmp);
-		spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
-
-		while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
-			struct request *rq = list_entry(tmp.next,
-					struct request, queuelist);
-			list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
-			blk_mq_resubmit_io(rq);
-		}
-		clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE, &hctx->state);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 11:44 [PATCH V5 0/6] blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2020-01-15 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE Ming Lei
2020-01-15 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: prepare for draining IO when hctx's all CPUs are offline Ming Lei
2020-01-15 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: stop to handle IO and drain IO before hctx becomes inactive Ming Lei
2020-01-15 11:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is inactive Ming Lei
2020-01-15 11:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-01-15 11:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: deactivate hctx when all its CPUs are offline when running queue Ming Lei
2020-01-15 17:00 ` [PATCH V5 0/6] blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug John Garry
2020-01-20 13:23   ` John Garry
2020-01-31 10:04     ` Ming Lei
2020-01-31 10:24       ` John Garry
2020-01-31 10:58         ` Ming Lei
2020-01-31 17:51           ` John Garry
2020-01-31 18:02             ` John Garry
2020-02-01  1:31               ` Ming Lei
2020-02-01 11:05                 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-01 11:31                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-03 10:30                     ` John Garry
2020-02-03 10:49                       ` John Garry
2020-02-03 10:59                         ` Ming Lei
2020-02-03 12:56                           ` John Garry
2020-02-03 15:43                             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-03 18:16                               ` John Garry
2020-02-05 14:08                                 ` John Garry
2020-02-05 14:23                                   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 10:56           ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200115114409.28895-6-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox