From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: allocate tags in batches
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:07:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115120757.GA30398@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107163037.31745-7-axboe@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:30:37AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Instead of grabbing tags one by one, grab a batch and store the local
> cache in the software queue. Then subsequent tag allocations can just
> grab free tags from there, without having to hit the shared tag map.
>
> We flush these batches out if we run out of tags on the hardware queue.
> The intent here is this should rarely happen.
>
> This works very well in practice, with anywhere from 40-60 batch counts
> seen regularly in testing.
Could you describe your test a bit? I am just wondering if multi-task IO
can perform well as before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 18 +++++++
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> block/blk-mq-tag.h | 3 ++
> block/blk-mq.c | 16 +++++--
> block/blk-mq.h | 5 ++
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> index e789f830ff59..914be72d080e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> @@ -659,6 +659,23 @@ CTX_RQ_SEQ_OPS(default, HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT);
> CTX_RQ_SEQ_OPS(read, HCTX_TYPE_READ);
> CTX_RQ_SEQ_OPS(poll, HCTX_TYPE_POLL);
>
> +static ssize_t ctx_tag_hit_write(void *data, const char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data;
> +
> + ctx->tag_hit = ctx->tag_refill = 0;
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static int ctx_tag_hit_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data;
> +
> + seq_printf(m, "hit=%lu refills=%lu\n", ctx->tag_hit, ctx->tag_refill);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ctx_dispatched_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
> {
> struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data;
> @@ -800,6 +817,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_ctx_attrs[] = {
> {"read_rq_list", 0400, .seq_ops = &ctx_read_rq_list_seq_ops},
> {"poll_rq_list", 0400, .seq_ops = &ctx_poll_rq_list_seq_ops},
> {"dispatched", 0600, ctx_dispatched_show, ctx_dispatched_write},
> + {"tag_hit", 0600, ctx_tag_hit_show, ctx_tag_hit_write},
> {"merged", 0600, ctx_merged_show, ctx_merged_write},
> {"completed", 0600, ctx_completed_show, ctx_completed_write},
> {},
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index fbacde454718..94c1f16c6c71 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,100 @@ static int __blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
> return __sbitmap_queue_get(bt);
> }
>
> +static void ctx_flush_ipi(void *data)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data;
> + struct sbitmap_queue *bt = &hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, smp_processor_id());
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < hctx->queue->tag_set->nr_maps; i++) {
> + struct blk_mq_ctx_type *type = &ctx->type[i];
> +
> + if (!type->tags)
> + continue;
> +
> + __sbitmap_queue_clear_batch(bt, type->tag_offset, type->tags);
> + type->tags = 0;
> + }
> + atomic_dec(&hctx->flush_pending);
> +}
> +
> +void blk_mq_tag_ctx_flush_batch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + atomic_inc(&hctx->flush_pending);
> + smp_call_function_single(ctx->cpu, ctx_flush_ipi, hctx, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void blk_mq_tag_flush_batches(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&hctx->flush_pending, 0, hctx->nr_ctx))
> + return;
> + preempt_disable();
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask))
> + ctx_flush_ipi(hctx);
> + smp_call_function_many(hctx->cpumask, ctx_flush_ipi, hctx, false);
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +
> +void blk_mq_tag_queue_flush_batches(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i)
> + blk_mq_tag_flush_batches(hctx);
> +}
> +
> +static int blk_mq_get_tag_batch(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data->hctx;
> + struct blk_mq_ctx_type *type;
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data->ctx;
> + struct blk_mq_tags *tags;
> + struct sbitmap_queue *bt;
> + int tag = -1;
> +
> + if (!ctx || (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_INTERNAL))
> + return -1;
> +
> + tags = hctx->tags;
> + bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
> + /* don't do batches for round-robin or (very) sparse maps */
> + if (bt->round_robin || bt->sb.shift < ilog2(BITS_PER_LONG) - 1)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* we could make do with preempt disable, but we need to block flush */
> + local_irq_disable();
> + if (unlikely(ctx->cpu != smp_processor_id()))
> + goto out;
> +
> + type = &ctx->type[hctx->type];
> +
> + if (type->tags) {
> +get_tag:
> + ctx->tag_hit++;
> +
> + tag = __ffs(type->tags);
> + type->tags &= ~(1UL << tag);
> + tag += type->tag_offset;
> +out:
> + local_irq_enable();
> + return tag;
> + }
> +
> + /* no current tag cache, attempt to refill a batch */
> + if (!__sbitmap_queue_get_batch(bt, &type->tag_offset, &type->tags)) {
> + ctx->tag_refill++;
> + goto get_tag;
> + }
> +
> + goto out;
> +}
> +
> unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> {
> struct blk_mq_tags *tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
> @@ -116,8 +210,13 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> bt = &tags->breserved_tags;
> tag_offset = 0;
> } else {
> - bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
> tag_offset = tags->nr_reserved_tags;
> +
> + tag = blk_mq_get_tag_batch(data);
> + if (tag != -1)
> + goto found_tag;
> +
> + bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
> }
>
> tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data, bt);
> @@ -152,6 +251,9 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> if (tag != -1)
> break;
>
> + if (!(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED))
> + blk_mq_tag_flush_batches(data->hctx);
> +
> bt_prev = bt;
> io_schedule();
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> index 15bc74acb57e..b5964fff1630 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ extern int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> extern void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool);
> void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
> void *priv);
> +void blk_mq_tag_queue_flush_batches(struct request_queue *q);
> +void blk_mq_tag_ctx_flush_batch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx);
>
> static inline struct sbq_wait_state *bt_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index cc48a0ffa5ec..81140f61a7c9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2255,6 +2255,8 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, cpu);
> type = hctx->type;
>
> + blk_mq_tag_ctx_flush_batch(hctx, ctx);
When blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead() is called, the 'cpu' has been offline
already, so the flush via IPI may not work as expected.
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-07 16:30 [PATCHSET v2 0/6] blk-mq: per-ctx tag caching Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] sbitmap: remove cleared bitmask Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] sbitmap: add batch tag retrieval Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: remove 'clear_ctx_on_error' Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: remove ctx->queue Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: add struct blk_mq_ctx_type Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: allocate tags in batches Jens Axboe
2020-01-15 12:07 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200115120757.GA30398@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).