linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	jack@suse.cz, bvanassche@acm.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] bdi: replace bdi_dev_name() with bdi_get_dev_name()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:54:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323165436.GC4982@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200323132254.47157-4-yuyufen@huawei.com>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:22:53PM +0800, Yufen Yu wrote:
> Since kobj->name can be freed by bdi_unregister(), we try to copy
> the name into buffer rather than return name pointer. This patch
> is prepare for following patch to fix use-after-free for bdi->dev.

Well, most of these should have a bdi reference, because if they didn't
you couldn't copy out anyway.  I think you want to audit the callsites
and see who "leaks" the pointer and only copy in those cases.  And then
preferably send one patch per broken caller.  I'm also not really sure
if we need the new helper.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23 13:22 [PATCH v3 0/4] bdi: fix use-after-free for bdi device Yufen Yu
2020-03-23 13:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] bdi: use bdi_dev_name() to get device name Yufen Yu
2020-03-23 16:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 13:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] bdi: add new bdi_get_dev_name() Yufen Yu
2020-03-23 13:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] bdi: replace bdi_dev_name() with bdi_get_dev_name() Yufen Yu
2020-03-23 16:54   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-03-23 13:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] bdi: protect bdi->dev with spinlock Yufen Yu
2020-03-23 14:04   ` Greg KH
2020-03-23 14:10     ` Yufen Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200323165436.GC4982@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).