From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] block: improve the kerneldoc comments for submit_bio and generic_make_request
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:59:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200426025944.GB512559@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200425170944.968861-2-hch@lst.de>
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 07:09:34PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The current documentation is a little weird, as it doesn't clearly
> explain which function to use, and also has the guts of the information
> on generic_make_request, which is the internal interface for stacking
> drivers.
>
> Fix this up by properly documenting submit_bio, and only documenting
> the differences and the use case for generic_make_request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 35 ++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index dffff21008886..68351ee94ad2e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -992,28 +992,13 @@ generic_make_request_checks(struct bio *bio)
> }
>
> /**
> - * generic_make_request - hand a buffer to its device driver for I/O
> + * generic_make_request - re-submit a bio to the block device layer for I/O
> * @bio: The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
> *
> - * generic_make_request() is used to make I/O requests of block
> - * devices. It is passed a &struct bio, which describes the I/O that needs
> - * to be done.
> - *
> - * generic_make_request() does not return any status. The
> - * success/failure status of the request, along with notification of
> - * completion, is delivered asynchronously through the bio->bi_end_io
> - * function described (one day) else where.
> - *
> - * The caller of generic_make_request must make sure that bi_io_vec
> - * are set to describe the memory buffer, and that bi_dev and bi_sector are
> - * set to describe the device address, and the
> - * bi_end_io and optionally bi_private are set to describe how
> - * completion notification should be signaled.
> - *
> - * generic_make_request and the drivers it calls may use bi_next if this
> - * bio happens to be merged with someone else, and may resubmit the bio to
> - * a lower device by calling into generic_make_request recursively, which
> - * means the bio should NOT be touched after the call to ->make_request_fn.
> + * This is a version of submit_bio() that shall only be used for I/O that is
> + * resubmitted to lower level drivers by stacking block drivers. All file
No, generic_make_request() can be used by any block driver instead of
stacking drivers, see bio split, blk_throttle.c and bounce, maybe more.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-26 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-25 17:09 [RFC] more make_request optimizations Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: improve the kerneldoc comments for submit_bio and generic_make_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 2:59 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: cleanup the memory stall accounting in submit_bio Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: replace BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED with BIO_CGROUP_ACCT Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: add a bio_queue_enter helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: refactor generic_make_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: optimize generic_make_request for direct to blk-mq issue Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 2:53 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-27 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] block: optimize do_make_request " Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] block: move the call to blk_queue_enter_live out of blk_mq_get_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] block: remove a pointless queue enter pair in blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] block: remove a pointless queue enter pair in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] block: allow blk_mq_make_request to consume the q_usage_counter reference Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200426025944.GB512559@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).