From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5084BC433DF for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E438207F9 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="F3lI9Bmh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726180AbgEREHb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 00:07:31 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:35126 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725280AbgEREHb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 00:07:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1589774849; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t6RY7iLJPhArb3KrYiOZuhyUNPcsaIYuZP3UDTmH94c=; b=F3lI9BmhP1UHTOhm/IgYY9E7xbrxnUAmFdesfzLm1x9739cRdKxhJN43kb4jovEfxGddyn bFymoEUr9WY/F12bFps9eu8RsvKWXchRqwU9TIgDZi/hS2PTpkcLTUcXPzbKthCkZFfWIp sHCBUSHb2gEfTl1tO9kO9O2giHpd79w= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-300--fMtilqiP7OUUfkP4RC99A-1; Mon, 18 May 2020 00:07:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -fMtilqiP7OUUfkP4RC99A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9D6474; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-13-68.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F83F5D9DC; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 12:07:05 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , linux-block , John Garry , Bart Van Assche , Hannes Reinecke , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug(simplified version) Message-ID: <20200518040705.GC20647@T590> References: <20200515014153.2403464-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20200516123555.GA13448@lst.de> <20200517070853.GA30271@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200517070853.GA30271@lst.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 09:08:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 12:08:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 8:37 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > I took at stab at the series this morning, and fixed the fabrics > > > crash (blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx passed the cpumask of a NULL hctx), > > > and pre-loaded a bunch of cļeanups to let your changes fit in better. > > > > > > Let me know what you think, the git branch is here: > > > > > > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git blk-mq-hotplug > > > > > > Gitweb: > > > > > > http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/blk-mq-hotplug > > > > > > > I think the approach is fine, especially the driver tag related > > change, that was in my mind too, :-) > > > > I guess you will post them all soon, and I will take a close look > > after they are out. > > Let me know what you prefer - either I can send it out or you can > pick the series up. > I prefer you send it out because they depend on your another 5 posted cleanup patches. thanks, Ming