From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 17:30:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519153000.GB22286@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200519015420.GA70957@T590>
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:54:20AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> As Thomas clarified, workqueue hasn't such issue any more, and only other
> per CPU kthreads can run until the CPU clears the online bit.
>
> So the question is if IO can be submitted from such kernel context?
What other per-CPU kthreads even exist?
> > INACTIVE is set to the hctx, and it is set by the last CPU to be
> > offlined that is mapped to the hctx. once the bit is set the barrier
> > ensured it is seen everywhere before we start waiting for the requests
> > to finish. What is missing?:
>
> memory barrier should always be used as pair, and you should have mentioned
> that the implied barrier in test_and_set_bit_lock pair from sbitmap_get()
> is pair of smp_mb__after_atomic() in blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline().
Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst makes it pretty clear that the
special smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic barriers are only
used around the set_bit/clear_bit/change_bit operations, and not on the
test_bit side. That is also how they are used in all the callsites I
checked.
> Then setting tag bit and checking INACTIVE in blk_mq_get_tag() can be ordered,
> same with setting INACTIVE and checking tag bit in blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline().
Buy yes, even if not that would take care of it.
> BTW, smp_mb__before_atomic() in blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline() isn't needed.
True.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 6:39 blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: split out a __blk_mq_get_driver_tag helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] blk-mq: remove the bio argument to ->prepare_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] blk-mq: simplify the blk_mq_get_request calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] blk-mq: merge blk_mq_rq_ctx_init into __blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 8:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 9:31 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 11:54 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 13:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 14:11 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 18:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 18:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 1:54 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-19 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-05-20 1:18 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-20 3:04 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-20 8:03 ` io_uring vs CPU hotplug, was " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 14:45 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-20 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-20 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 19:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 20:18 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-20 22:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 22:40 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-21 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-21 8:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-21 9:23 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-21 18:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-21 18:45 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-21 20:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-22 1:57 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 13:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in __blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-mq: disable preemption during allocating request tag Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-mq: add blk_mq_all_tag_iter Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 8:42 ` John Garry
2020-05-18 9:21 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 11:49 ` blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v2 John Garry
2020-05-19 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-19 17:17 ` John Garry
2020-05-20 14:35 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519153000.GB22286@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).