Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs

Ming Lei
2020-06-16T01:01:26Z

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:27:30PM +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> > >
> > > John -
> > >
> > > I tried V7 series and debug further on mq-deadline interface. This
> > > time I have used another setup since HDD based setup is not readily
> > > available for me.
> > > In fact, I was able to simulate issue very easily using single
> > > scsi_device as well. BTW, this is not an issue with this RFC, but
> generic issue.
> > > Since I have converted nr_hw_queue > 1 for Broadcom product using this
> > > RFC, It becomes noticeable now.
> > >
> > > Problem - Using below command I see heavy CPU utilization on "
> > > native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath". This is because kblockd work queue
> > > is submitting IO from all the CPUs even though fio is bound to single
> CPU.
> > > Lock contention from " dd_dispatch_request" is causing this issue.
> > >
> > > numactl -C 13 fio
> > > single.fio --iodepth=32 --bs=4k --rw=randread --ioscheduler=none
> > > --numjobs=1 --cpus_allowed_policy=split --ioscheduler=mq-deadline
> > > --group_reporting --filename=/dev/sdd
> > >
> > > While running above command, ideally we expect only kworker/13 to be
> > active.
> > > But you can see below - All the CPU is attempting submission and lots
> > > of CPU consumption is due to lock contention.
> > >
> > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> COMMAND
> > > 2726 root 0 -20 0 0 0 R 56.5 0.0 0:53.20
> > > kworker/13:1H-k
> > > 7815 root 20 0 712404 15536 2228 R 43.2 0.0 0:05.03
> fio
> > > 2792 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 26.6 0.0 0:22.19
> > > kworker/18:1H-k
> > > 2791 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 19.9 0.0 0:17.17
> > > kworker/19:1H-k
> > > 1419 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 19.6 0.0 0:17.03
> > > kworker/20:1H-k
> > > 2793 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 18.3 0.0 0:15.64
> > > kworker/21:1H-k
> > > 1424 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 17.3 0.0 0:14.99
> > > kworker/22:1H-k
> > > 2626 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.9 0.0 0:14.68
> > > kworker/26:1H-k
> > > 2794 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.9 0.0 0:14.87
> > > kworker/23:1H-k
> > > 2795 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.9 0.0 0:14.81
> > > kworker/24:1H-k
> > > 2797 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.9 0.0 0:14.62
> > > kworker/27:1H-k
> > > 1415 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.6 0.0 0:14.44
> > > kworker/30:1H-k
> > > 2669 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.6 0.0 0:14.38
> > > kworker/31:1H-k
> > > 2796 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.6 0.0 0:14.74
> > > kworker/25:1H-k
> > > 2799 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.6 0.0 0:14.56
> > > kworker/28:1H-k
> > > 1425 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.3 0.0 0:14.21
> > > kworker/34:1H-k
> > > 2746 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.3 0.0 0:14.33
> > > kworker/32:1H-k
> > > 2798 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.3 0.0 0:14.50
> > > kworker/29:1H-k
> > > 2800 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 16.3 0.0 0:14.27
> > > kworker/33:1H-k
> > > 1423 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.9 0.0 0:14.10
> > > kworker/54:1H-k
> > > 1784 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.9 0.0 0:14.03
> > > kworker/55:1H-k
> > > 2801 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.9 0.0 0:14.15
> > > kworker/35:1H-k
> > > 2815 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.9 0.0 0:13.97
> > > kworker/56:1H-k
> > > 1484 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.6 0.0 0:13.90
> > > kworker/57:1H-k
> > > 1485 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.6 0.0 0:13.82
> > > kworker/59:1H-k
> > > 1519 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.6 0.0 0:13.64
> > > kworker/62:1H-k
> > > 2315 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.6 0.0 0:13.87
> > > kworker/58:1H-k
> > > 2627 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.6 0.0 0:13.69
> > > kworker/61:1H-k
> > > 2816 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 15.6 0.0 0:13.75
> > > kworker/60:1H-k
> > >
> > >
> > > I root cause this issue -
> > >
> > > Block layer always queue IO on hctx context mapped to CPU-13, but hw
> > > queue run from all the hctx context.
> > > I noticed in my test hctx48 has queued all the IOs. No other hctx has
> > > queued IO. But all the hctx is counting for "run".
> > >
> > > # cat hctx48/queued
> > > 2087058
> > >
> > > #cat hctx*/run
> > > 151318
> > > 30038
> > > 83110
> > > 50680
> > > 69907
> > > 60391
> > > 111239
> > > 18036
> > > 33935
> > > 91648
> > > 34582
> > > 22853
> > > 61286
> > > 19489
> > >
> > > Below patch has fix - "Run the hctx queue for which request was
> > > completed instead of running all the hardware queue."
> > > If this looks valid fix, please include in V8 OR I can post separate
> > > patch for this. Just want to have some level of review from this
> discussion.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c index
> > > 0652acd..f52118f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > @@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req,
> > > blk_status_t error,
> > > struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> > > struct scsi_device *sdev = cmd->device;
> > > struct request_queue *q = sdev->request_queue;
> > > + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *mq_hctx = req->mq_hctx;
> > >
> > > if (blk_update_request(req, error, bytes))
> > > return true;
> > > @@ -595,7 +596,8 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req,
> > > blk_status_t error,
> > > !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list))
> > > kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work);
> > > else
> > > - blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
> > > + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(mq_hctx, true);
> > > + //blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
> >
> > This way may cause IO hang because ->device_busy is shared by all hctxs.
>
> From SCSI stack, if we attempt to run all h/w queue, is it possible that
> block layer actually run hw_queue which has really not queued any IO.
> Currently, in case of mq-deadline, IOS are inserted using
> "dd_insert_request". This function will add IOs on elevator data which is
> per request queue and not per hctx.
> When there is an attempt to run hctx, "blk_mq_sched_has_work" will check
> pending work which is per request queue and not per hctx.
> Because of this, IOs queued on only one hctx will be run from all the hctx
> and this will create unnecessary lock contention.

Deadline is supposed for HDD. slow disks, so the lock contention shouldn't have
been one problem given there is seldom MQ HDD. before this patchset.

Another related issue is default scheduler, I guess deadline still should have
been the default io sched for HDDs. attached to this kind HBA with multiple reply
queues and single submission queue.

>
> How about below patch - ?
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.h b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> index 126021f..1d30bd3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_sched_has_work(struct
> blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> {
> struct elevator_queue *e = hctx->queue->elevator;
>
> + /* If current hctx has not queued any request, there is no need to
> run.
> + * blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on hctx which has queued IO will handle
> + * running specific hctx.
> + */
> + if (!hctx->queued)
> + return false;
> +
> if (e && e->type->ops.has_work)
> return e->type->ops.has_work(hctx);

->queued is increased only and not decreased just for debug purpose so far, so
it can't be relied for this purpose.

One approach is to add one similar counter, and maintain it by scheduler's insert/dispatch
callback.

Thanks,
Ming