From: "Javier González" <javier@javigon.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] block: add support for selecting all zones
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:52:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626065241.u4fd3m7624kdsonw@mpHalley.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR04MB37515E78D85933EAFE159B0AE7930@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 26.06.2020 06:35, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>On 2020/06/26 14:58, Javier González wrote:
>> On 26.06.2020 01:27, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 2020/06/25 21:22, Javier González wrote:
>>>> From: Javier González <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add flag to allow selecting all zones on a single zone management
>>>> operation
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier González <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> block/blk-zoned.c | 3 +++
>>>> include/linux/blk_types.h | 3 ++-
>>>> include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h | 9 +++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-zoned.c b/block/blk-zoned.c
>>>> index e87c60004dc5..29194388a1bb 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-zoned.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-zoned.c
>>>> @@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ int blkdev_zone_mgmt_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>>>> return -ENOTTY;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + if (zmgmt.flags & BLK_ZONE_SELECT_ALL)
>>>> + op |= REQ_ZONE_ALL;
>>>> +
>>>> return blkdev_zone_mgmt(bdev, op, zmgmt.sector, zmgmt.nr_sectors,
>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
>>>> index ccb895f911b1..16b57fb2b99c 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
>>>> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits {
>>>> * work item to avoid such priority inversions.
>>>> */
>>>> __REQ_CGROUP_PUNT,
>>>> + __REQ_ZONE_ALL, /* apply zone operation to all zones */
>>>>
>>>> /* command specific flags for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES: */
>>>> __REQ_NOUNMAP, /* do not free blocks when zeroing */
>>>> @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits {
>>>> #define REQ_BACKGROUND (1ULL << __REQ_BACKGROUND)
>>>> #define REQ_NOWAIT (1ULL << __REQ_NOWAIT)
>>>> #define REQ_CGROUP_PUNT (1ULL << __REQ_CGROUP_PUNT)
>>>> -
>>>> +#define REQ_ZONE_ALL (1ULL << __REQ_ZONE_ALL)
>>>> #define REQ_NOUNMAP (1ULL << __REQ_NOUNMAP)
>>>> #define REQ_HIPRI (1ULL << __REQ_HIPRI)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h b/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h
>>>> index 07b5fde21d9f..a8c89fe58f97 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h
>>>> @@ -157,6 +157,15 @@ enum blk_zone_action {
>>>> BLK_ZONE_MGMT_RESET = 0x4,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * enum blk_zone_mgmt_flags - Flags for blk_zone_mgmt
>>>> + *
>>>> + * BLK_ZONE_SELECT_ALL: Select all zones for current zone action
>>>> + */
>>>> +enum blk_zone_mgmt_flags {
>>>> + BLK_ZONE_SELECT_ALL = 1 << 0,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>> * struct blk_zone_mgmt - Extended zoned management
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>
>>> NACK.
>>>
>>> Details:
>>> 1) REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET together with REQ_ZONE_ALL is the same as
>>> REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL, isn't it ? You are duplicating a functionality that
>>> already exists.
>>> 2) The patch introduces REQ_ZONE_ALL at the block layer only without defining
>>> how it ties into SCSI and NVMe driver use of it. Is REQ_ZONE_ALL indicating that
>>> the zone management commands are to be executed with the ALL bit set ? If yes,
>>> that will break device-mapper. See the special code for handling
>>> REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL. That code is in place for a reason: the target block
>>> device may not be an entire physical device. In that case, applying a zone
>>> management command to all zones of the physical drive is wrong.
>>> 3) REQ_ZONE_ALL seems completely equivalent to specifying a sector range of [0
>>> .. drive capacity]. So what is the point ? The current interface handles that.
>>> That is how we chose between REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET and REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL right now.
>>> 4) Without any in-kernel user, I do not see the point. And for applications, I
>>> do not see any good use case for doing open all, close all, offline all or
>>> finish all. If you have any such good use case, please elaborate.
>>>
>>
>> The main use if reset all, but without having to look through all zones,
>> as it imposes an overhead when we have a large number of zones. Having
>> the possibility to offload it to HW is more efficient.
>>
>> I had not thought about the device mapper use case. Would it be an
>> option to translate this into REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL when we have a
>> device mapper (or any other case where this might break) and then leave
>> the bit go to the driver if it applies to the whole device?
>
>But REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL is already implemented and supported and will reset
>all zones of a drive using a single command if the ioctl is called for the
>entire sector range of a physical drive. For device mapper with a partial
>mapping, the per zone reset loop will be used. If you have no other use case for
>the REQ_ZONE_ALL flag, what is the point here ? Reset is already optimized for
>the all zones case
OK. I might have missed this. I thought we were sending several commands
instead of a single reset with the bit. I will check again. Thanks for
pointing at this.
Javier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-25 12:21 [PATCH 0/6] ZNS: Extra features for current patches Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: introduce IOCTL for zone mgmt Javier González
2020-06-26 1:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:01 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 6:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:51 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 7:03 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 7:08 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: add support for selecting all zones Javier González
2020-06-26 1:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 5:58 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 6:35 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:52 ` Javier González [this message]
2020-06-26 7:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: add support for zone offline transition Javier González
2020-06-25 14:12 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:48 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 1:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:18 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 9:11 ` hch
2020-06-26 9:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 9:17 ` hch
2020-06-26 10:02 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 9:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 1:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:08 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 6:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:58 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 7:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 7:26 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: introduce IOCTL to report dev properties Javier González
2020-06-25 13:10 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:42 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 19:58 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-26 6:24 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 20:25 ` Keith Busch
2020-06-26 6:28 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 15:52 ` Keith Busch
2020-06-26 16:25 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 0:57 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:27 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 1:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:22 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: add zone attr. to zone mgmt IOCTL struct Javier González
2020-06-25 15:13 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:51 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 1:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:03 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 6:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:49 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 10:01 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: Add consistency check for zone count Javier González
2020-06-25 13:16 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:45 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 21:49 ` Keith Busch
2020-06-26 0:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:13 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 6:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 6:55 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 7:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 7:29 ` Javier González
2020-06-26 7:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26 9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 10:03 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] ZNS: Extra features for current patches Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 14:48 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:39 ` Javier González
2020-06-25 19:53 ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-26 6:26 ` Javier González
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200626065241.u4fd3m7624kdsonw@mpHalley.localdomain \
--to=javier@javigon.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=selvakuma.s1@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox