From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BAFC433E0 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035E02070A for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="I7Jep594" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726841AbgG0CIW (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:08:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:56799 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726072AbgG0CIW (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:08:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595815700; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eHxRyECYtQanh0ezBnPcM1ZXwerag91PJylDaVDzjY4=; b=I7Jep594kWuA+gcrg0yauKOFw0aAVISprWhuSxSXZizlytxMDLilgpV2aO5MtUo1xzKi22 x3yTaBZ9/4l3JtwukK1aTGd0HUp3Vz8IaOmVVUdd9Raj0LFDuFbFZKbLTgycxlzAxxFAcd DOkDqyh83+3gBC2HWUGmeIkTht/zCxM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-148-YJqsOQdjOPqpH92RAWKq1A-1; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:08:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YJqsOQdjOPqpH92RAWKq1A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500DA1005510; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-12-208.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.208]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A643A1992D; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:08:03 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Chao Leng Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] blk-mq: add async quiesce interface Message-ID: <20200727020803.GC1129253@T590> References: <20200726002301.145627-1-sagi@grimberg.me> <20200726002301.145627-2-sagi@grimberg.me> <20200726093132.GD1110104@T590> <9ac5f658-31b3-bb19-e5fe-385a629a7d67@grimberg.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ac5f658-31b3-bb19-e5fe-385a629a7d67@grimberg.me> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 09:27:56AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > > > +void blk_mq_quiesce_queue_async(struct request_queue *q) > > > +{ > > > + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx; > > > + unsigned int i; > > > + > > > + blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(q); > > > + > > > + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) { > > > + init_completion(&hctx->rcu_sync.completion); > > > + init_rcu_head(&hctx->rcu_sync.head); > > > + if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING) > > > + call_srcu(hctx->srcu, &hctx->rcu_sync.head, > > > + wakeme_after_rcu); > > > + else > > > + call_rcu(&hctx->rcu_sync.head, > > > + wakeme_after_rcu); > > > + } > > > > Looks not necessary to do anything in case of !BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING, and single > > synchronize_rcu() is OK for all hctx during waiting. > > That's true, but I want a single interface for both. v2 had exactly > that, but I decided that this approach is better. Not sure one new interface is needed, and one simple way is to: 1) call blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait() for each request queue 2) wait in driver specific way Or just wondering why nvme doesn't use set->tag_list to retrieve NS, then you may add per-tagset APIs for the waiting. > > Also, having the driver call a single synchronize_rcu isn't great Too many drivers are using synchronize_rcu(): $ git grep -n synchronize_rcu ./drivers/ | wc 186 524 11384 > layering (as quiesce can possibly use a different mechanism in the future). What is the different mechanism? > So drivers assumptions like: > > /* > * SCSI never enables blk-mq's BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING flag so > * calling synchronize_rcu() once is enough. > */ > WARN_ON_ONCE(shost->tag_set.flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING); > > if (!ret) > synchronize_rcu(); > > Are not great... Both rcu read lock/unlock and synchronize_rcu is global interface, then it is reasonable to avoid unnecessary synchronize_rcu(). > > > > +} > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue_async); > > > + > > > +void blk_mq_quiesce_queue_async_wait(struct request_queue *q) > > > +{ > > > + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx; > > > + unsigned int i; > > > + > > > + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) { > > > + wait_for_completion(&hctx->rcu_sync.completion); > > > + destroy_rcu_head(&hctx->rcu_sync.head); > > > + } > > > +} > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_quiesce_queue_async_wait); > > > + > > > /** > > > * blk_mq_quiesce_queue() - wait until all ongoing dispatches have finished > > > * @q: request queue. > > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h > > > index 23230c1d031e..5536e434311a 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > struct blk_mq_tags; > > > struct blk_flush_queue; > > > @@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx { > > > */ > > > struct list_head hctx_list; > > > + struct rcu_synchronize rcu_sync; > > The above struct takes at least 5 words, and I'd suggest to avoid it, > > and the hctx->srcu should be re-used for waiting BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING. > > Meantime !BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING doesn't need it. > > It is at the end and contains exactly what is needed to synchronize. Not The sync is simply single global synchronize_rcu(), and why bother to add extra >=40bytes for each hctx. > sure what you mean by reuse hctx->srcu? You already reuses hctx->srcu, but not see reason to add extra rcu_synchronize to each hctx for just simulating one single synchronize_rcu(). Thanks, Ming