From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/3] block: virtio_blk: fix handling single range discard request
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:52:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817095241.2494763-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200817095241.2494763-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
1f23816b8eb8 ("virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support") starts
to support multi-range discard for virtio-blk. However, the virtio-blk
disk may report max discard segment as 1, at least that is exactly what
qemu is doing.
So far, block layer switches to normal request merge if max discard segment
limit is 1, and multiple bios can be merged to single segment. This way may
cause memory corruption in virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes().
Fix the issue by handling single max discard segment in straightforward
way.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1f23816b8eb8 ("virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support")
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 63b213e00b37..b2e48dac1ebd 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -126,16 +126,31 @@ static int virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes(struct request *req, bool unmap)
if (!range)
return -ENOMEM;
- __rq_for_each_bio(bio, req) {
- u64 sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
- u32 num_sectors = bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
-
- range[n].flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
- range[n].num_sectors = cpu_to_le32(num_sectors);
- range[n].sector = cpu_to_le64(sector);
- n++;
+ /*
+ * Single max discard segment means multi-range discard isn't
+ * supported, and block layer only runs contiguity merge like
+ * normal RW request. So we can't reply on bio for retrieving
+ * each range info.
+ */
+ if (queue_max_discard_segments(req->q) == 1) {
+ range[0].flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
+ range[0].num_sectors = cpu_to_le32(blk_rq_sectors(req));
+ range[0].sector = cpu_to_le64(blk_rq_pos(req));
+ n = 1;
+ } else {
+ __rq_for_each_bio(bio, req) {
+ u64 sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
+ u32 num_sectors = bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+
+ range[n].flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
+ range[n].num_sectors = cpu_to_le32(num_sectors);
+ range[n].sector = cpu_to_le64(sector);
+ n++;
+ }
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(n != segments);
+
req->special_vec.bv_page = virt_to_page(range);
req->special_vec.bv_offset = offset_in_page(range);
req->special_vec.bv_len = sizeof(*range) * segments;
--
2.25.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 9:52 [PATCH V3 0/3] block: fix discard merge for single max discard segment Ming Lei
2020-08-17 9:52 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] block: respect queue limit of " Ming Lei
2020-08-17 9:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-08-18 13:52 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] block: virtio_blk: fix handling single range discard request Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-08-17 9:52 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] block: rename blk_discard_mergable as blk_discard_support_multi_range Ming Lei
2020-08-17 10:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 14:00 ` [PATCH V3 0/3] block: fix discard merge for single max discard segment Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200817095241.2494763-3-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dverkamp@chromium.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox