From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bt_iter+0x80/0xf8
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:21:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819142147.GA2795390@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83de2368-a122-3b9c-db15-63ea442eecd9@huawei.com>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:14:34AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 19/08/2020 09:58, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > ah, right. I vaguely remember this. Well, if we didn't have a reliable
> > > reproducer before, we do now.
> > OK, that is great, please try the following patch:
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > index 32d82e23b095..f18632c524e9 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > @@ -185,19 +185,19 @@ static bool bt_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
> > {
> > struct bt_iter_data *iter_data = data;
> > struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = iter_data->hctx;
> > - struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
> > + struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->sched_tags ?: hctx->tags;
> > bool reserved = iter_data->reserved;
> > struct request *rq;
> > if (!reserved)
> > bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags;
> > - rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
> > + rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
> > /*
> > * We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
> > * test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
> > */
> > - if (rq && rq->q == hctx->queue)
> > + if (rq && rq->tag >= 0 && rq->q == hctx->queue)
> > return iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> > return true;
> > }
> > @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
> > return;
> > queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> > - struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
> > + struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->sched_tags ?: hctx->tags;
> > /*
> > * If no software queues are currently mapped to this
>
> I gave it a quick try and it looks to silence KASAN. I'll try to test more
> over the next day or so.
>
> BTW, I doubt KASAN is even right to complain about this. I'll check that
> thread you pointed me at to learn more about what was discussed on that.
I guess that elevator switch may have to be involved in your reproducer, stale
request which are freed before switching to new elevator can stay in tags->rqs[],
then these stale requests are retrieved when reading iostat before old request slots in
tags->rqs[] are reset.
The patch should fix this issue.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-18 12:03 [REPORT] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bt_iter+0x80/0xf8 John Garry
2020-08-18 18:19 ` John Garry
2020-08-19 0:00 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-19 7:43 ` John Garry
2020-08-19 8:58 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-19 10:14 ` John Garry
2020-08-19 14:21 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-08-19 16:48 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200819142147.GA2795390@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).