From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: fix use-after-free on stale request
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:34:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826123453.GA126923@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826122407.GA126130@T590>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:24:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:03:37PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> > On 21/08/2020 03:49, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Hello Bart,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On 8/20/20 11:03 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > We can't run allocating driver tag and updating tags->rqs[tag] atomically,
> > > > > so stale request may be retrieved from tags->rqs[tag]. More seriously, the
> > > > > stale request may have been freed via updating nr_requests or switching
> > > > > elevator or other use cases.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is one long-term issue, and Jianchao previous worked towards using
> > > > > static_rqs[] for iterating request, one problem is that it can be hard
> > > > > to use when iterating over tagset.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patchset takes another different approach for fixing the issue: cache
> > > > > freed rqs pages and release them until all tags->rqs[] references on these
> > > > > pages are gone.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ming,
> > > >
> > > > Is this the only possible solution? Would it e.g. be possible to protect the
> > > > code that iterates over all tags with rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() and
> > > > to free pages that contain request pointers only after an RCU grace period has
> > > > expired?
> > >
> > > That can't work, tags->rqs[] is host-wide, request pool belongs to scheduler tag
> > > and it is owned by request queue actually. When one elevator is switched on this
> > > request queue or updating nr_requests, the old request pool of this queue is freed,
> > > but IOs are still queued from other request queues in this tagset. Elevator switch
> > > or updating nr_requests on one request queue shouldn't or can't other request queues
> > > in the same tagset.
> > >
> > > Meantime the reference in tags->rqs[] may stay a bit long, and RCU can't cover this
> > > case.
> > >
> > > Also we can't reset the related tags->rqs[tag] simply somewhere, cause it may
> > > race with new driver tag allocation.
> >
> > How about iterate all tags->rqs[] for all scheduler tags when exiting the
> > scheduler, etc, and clear any scheduler requests references, like this:
> >
> > cmpxchg(&hctx->tags->rqs[tag], scheduler_rq, 0);
> >
> > So we NULLify any tags->rqs[] entries which contain a scheduler request of
> > concern atomically, cleaning up any references.
>
> Looks this approach can work given cmpxchg() will prevent new store on
> this address.
Another process may still be reading this to-be-freed request via
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter or blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(), meantime NULLify is done
and all requests of this scheduler are freed.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-20 18:03 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: fix use-after-free on stale request Ming Lei
2020-08-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: define max_order for allocating rqs pages as macro Ming Lei
2020-08-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: add helper of blk_mq_get_hw_queue_node Ming Lei
2020-08-25 8:55 ` John Garry
2020-08-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: add helpers for allocating/freeing pages of request pool Ming Lei
2020-08-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] blk-mq: cache freed request pool pages Ming Lei
2020-08-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: check and shrink freed request pool page Ming Lei
2020-08-20 20:30 ` [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: fix use-after-free on stale request Bart Van Assche
2020-08-21 2:49 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-26 12:03 ` John Garry
2020-08-26 12:24 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-26 12:34 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-08-26 12:56 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200826123453.GA126923@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox