public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc3-020ad03.cki (block)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:02:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904010233.GA817918@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cki.538AE6A321.BMB0X5ZYG5@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:07:57PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>        Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
>             Commit: 020ad0333b03 - Merge branch 'for-5.10/block' into for-next
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>              Merge: OK
>            Compile: OK
>              Tests: PANICKED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>   https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/09/02/613166
> 
> One or more kernel tests failed:
> 
>     ppc64le:
>      💥 storage: software RAID testing
> 
>     aarch64:
>      💥 storage: software RAID testing
> 
>     x86_64:
>      💥 storage: software RAID testing
> 
> We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
> detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
> 
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
> ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
> 
>         ,-.   ,-.
>        ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
>         `-',-.`-'   Kernel
>           ( I )     Integration
>            `-'
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Compile testing
> ---------------
> 
> We compiled the kernel for 4 architectures:
> 
>     aarch64:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     ppc64le:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     s390x:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     x86_64:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
> 
> 
> Hardware testing
> ----------------
> We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
> 
>   aarch64:
>     Host 1:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ ACPI table test
>        ✅ LTP
>        ✅ Loopdev Sanity
>        ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
>        ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
>        ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
>        ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
>        🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
>        🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
> 
>     Host 2:
> 
>        ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
>        with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
>        This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
> 
>        ⚡⚡⚡ Boot test
>        ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - ext4
>        ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - xfs
>        ⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing
>        ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
> 
>     Host 3:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ xfstests - ext4
>        ✅ xfstests - xfs
>        💥 storage: software RAID testing
>        ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
> 
>   ppc64le:
>     Host 1:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
> 
>     Host 2:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ xfstests - ext4
>        ✅ xfstests - xfs
>        💥 storage: software RAID testing
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
> 
>     Host 3:
> 
>        ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
>        with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
>        This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
> 
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ⚡⚡⚡ LTP
>        ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity
>        ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create
>        ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
>        ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ CIFS Connectathon
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
> 
>   s390x:
>     Host 1:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ stress: stress-ng
>        🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
> 
>     Host 2:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ LTP
>        ✅ Loopdev Sanity
>        ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
>        ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
>        ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
>        🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
>        🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
> 
>   x86_64:
>     Host 1:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ Storage SAN device stress - qedf driver
> 
>     Host 2:
>        ⏱  Boot test
>        ⏱  Storage SAN device stress - mpt3sas_gen1
> 
>     Host 3:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ xfstests - ext4
>        ✅ xfstests - xfs
>        💥 storage: software RAID testing
>        ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
> 
>     Host 4:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ Storage SAN device stress - lpfc driver
> 
>     Host 5:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
> 
>     Host 6:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ ACPI table test
>        ✅ LTP
>        ✅ Loopdev Sanity
>        ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
>        ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
>        ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
>        ✅ kernel-rt: rt_migrate_test
>        ✅ kernel-rt: rteval
>        ✅ kernel-rt: sched_deadline
>        ✅ kernel-rt: smidetect
>        ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
>        🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
>        🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
> 
>     Host 7:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ kdump - sysrq-c - megaraid_sas
> 
>     Host 8:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ Storage SAN device stress - qla2xxx driver
> 
>     Host 9:
>        ⏱  Boot test
>        ⏱  kdump - sysrq-c - mpt3sas_gen1
> 
>   Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests

Hello,

Can you share us the exact commands for setting up xfstests over
'software RAID testing' from the above tree?

BTW I can't reproduce it by running xfstest generic/551 on my simple raid10
settings, include raid stop/remove steps.

Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-04  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-03 17:07 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc3-020ad03.cki (block) CKI Project
2020-09-03 17:10 ` Rachel Sibley
2020-09-03 17:46   ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-03 18:59     ` Rachel Sibley
2020-09-03 19:58       ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-09-03 20:53         ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-04  3:22           ` Ming Lei
2020-09-04  3:37             ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-04  4:24               ` Ming Lei
2020-09-04 15:06                 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-04  1:02 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-09-04 11:06   ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-09-06  3:19     ` 💥 PANICKED: Test report for?kernel " Ming Lei
2020-09-07 18:49       ` 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel " Veronika Kabatova

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200904010233.GA817918@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
    --cc=czhong@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox