From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: always allow reserved allocation in hctx_may_queue
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:44:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911094453.160109-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
NVMe shares tagset between fabric queue and admin queue or between
connect_q and NS queue, so hctx_may_queue() can be called to allocate
request for these queues.
Tags can be reserved in these tagset. Before error recovery, there is
often lots of in-flight requests which can't be completed, and new
reserved request may be needed in error recovery path. However,
hctx_may_queue() can always return false because there is too many
in-flight requests which can't be completed during error handling.
Finally, everything can't move on.
Fix this issue by always allowing reserved tag allocation in
hctx_may_queue(). This ways is reasonable because reserved tag
suppose to be ready any time.
Cc: David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Cc: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 3 ++-
block/blk-mq.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index c31c4a0478a5..aacf10decdbd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
static int __blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
struct sbitmap_queue *bt)
{
- if (!data->q->elevator && !hctx_may_queue(data->hctx, bt))
+ if (!data->q->elevator && !(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED) &&
+ !hctx_may_queue(data->hctx, bt))
return BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
if (data->shallow_depth)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index ccb500e38008..91cff275451d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1147,15 +1147,17 @@ static bool __blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
struct sbitmap_queue *bt = rq->mq_hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
unsigned int tag_offset = rq->mq_hctx->tags->nr_reserved_tags;
int tag;
+ bool reserved = blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(rq->mq_hctx->sched_tags,
+ rq->internal_tag);
blk_mq_tag_busy(rq->mq_hctx);
- if (blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(rq->mq_hctx->sched_tags, rq->internal_tag)) {
+ if (reserved) {
bt = rq->mq_hctx->tags->breserved_tags;
tag_offset = 0;
}
- if (!hctx_may_queue(rq->mq_hctx, bt))
+ if (!reserved && !hctx_may_queue(rq->mq_hctx, bt))
return false;
tag = __sbitmap_queue_get(bt);
if (tag == BLK_MQ_NO_TAG)
--
2.25.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-11 9:44 Ming Lei [this message]
2020-09-11 9:52 ` [PATCH] blk-mq: always allow reserved allocation in hctx_may_queue Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-11 10:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200911094453.160109-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox