From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, song@kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [git pull] 2 reverts for 5.11 to fix v5.10 MD regression
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:47:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201214174757.GC2290@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi Linus,
The following changes since commit 2c85ebc57b3e1817b6ce1a6b703928e113a90442:
Linux 5.10 (2020-12-13 14:41:30 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git tags/for-5.11/revert-problem-v5.10-raid-changes
for you to fetch changes up to 0941e3b0653fef1ea68287f6a948c6c68a45c9ba:
Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10" (2020-12-14 12:12:08 -0500)
Please pull, thanks.
Mike
----------------------------------------------------------------
A cascade of MD reverts occurred late in the v5.10-rcX cycle due to MD
raid10 discard optimizations having introduced potential for
corruption. Those reverts exposed a dm-raid.c compiler warning that
wasn't ever knowingly introduced. That min_not_zero() type mismatch
warning was thought to be safely fixed simply by changing 'struct
mddev' to use 'unsigned int' rather than int for chunk_sectors members
in that struct. I proposed either using a cast local to dm-raid.c but
thought changing the type to 'unsigned int' more correct. While that
may be, not enough testing was paired with code review associated with
making that change. As such we were left exposed and the result was a
report that with v5.10 btrfs on MD RAID6 failed to mount:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/14/7
Given that report, it is justified to simply revert these offending
commits. stable@ has already taken steps to revert these for 5.10.1 -
this pull request just makes sure mainline does so too.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Snitzer (2):
Revert "md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned"
Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10"
drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +++++-------
drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-14 17:47 Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-12-14 19:51 ` [dm-devel] [git pull] 2 reverts for 5.11 to fix v5.10 MD regression pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201214174757.GC2290@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).