linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:07:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106090758.GB3845805@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210105135419.68715-1-mfo@canonical.com>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:54:19AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> There's an I/O error on fsync() in a detached loop device
> if it has been previously attached.
> 
> The issue is write cache is enabled in the attach path in
> loop_configure() but it isn't disabled in the detach path;
> thus it remains enabled in the block device regardless of
> whether it is attached or not.
> 
> Now fsync() can get an I/O request that will just be failed
> later in loop_queue_rq() as device's state is not 'Lo_bound'.
> 
> So, disable write cache in the detach path.
> 
> Test-case:
> 
>     # DEV=/dev/loop7
> 
>     # IMG=/tmp/image
>     # truncate --size 1M $IMG
> 
>     # losetup $DEV $IMG
>     # losetup -d $DEV
> 
> Before:
> 
>     # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
>     fsync(3)                                = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
>     Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/loop7: Input/output error
>     [  982.529929] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop7, sector 0 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 0 prio class 0
> 
> After:
> 
>     # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
>     fsync(3)                                = 0

But IO on detached loop should have been failed, right? The magic is
that submit_bio_checks() filters FLUSH request for queues which doesn't
support writeback cache, and always fake a normal completion.

I understand that the issue is that user becomes confused with this observation
because no such failure if they run 'parted -s /dev/loop0 print' on one detached
loop disk if it is never attached.


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05 13:54 [PATCH v2] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-06  9:07 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-01-06 23:33   ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-07  7:10     ` Ming Lei
2021-01-07 18:20       ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210106090758.GB3845805@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eric.desrochers@canonical.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfo@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).