linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discard requests correctly
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:27:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204022740.GB1108591@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201164850.391332-1-djeffery@redhat.com>

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:48:50AM -0500, David Jeffery wrote:
> When a stacked block device inserts a request into another block device
> using blk_insert_cloned_request, the request's nr_phys_segments field gets
> recalculated by a call to blk_recalc_rq_segments in
> blk_cloned_rq_check_limits. But blk_recalc_rq_segments does not know how to
> handle multi-segment discards. For disk types which can handle
> multi-segment discards like nvme, this results in discard requests which
> claim a single segment when it should report several, triggering a warning
> in nvme and causing nvme to fail the discard from the invalid state.
> 
>  WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 191 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:700 nvme_setup_discard+0x170/0x1e0 [nvme_core]
>  ...
>  nvme_setup_cmd+0x217/0x270 [nvme_core]
>  nvme_loop_queue_rq+0x51/0x1b0 [nvme_loop]
>  __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0xe7/0x1b0
>  blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0x41/0x70
>  ? blk_account_io_start+0x40/0x50
>  dm_mq_queue_rq+0x200/0x3e0
>  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x10a/0x7d0
>  ? __sbitmap_queue_get+0x25/0x90
>  ? elv_rb_del+0x1f/0x30
>  ? deadline_remove_request+0x55/0xb0
>  ? dd_dispatch_request+0x181/0x210
>  __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x144/0x290
>  ? bio_attempt_discard_merge+0x134/0x1f0
>  __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x129/0x180
>  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60
>  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x47/0xe0
>  __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x15b/0x170
>  blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x68/0xe0
>  blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xf0/0x170
>  blk_finish_plug+0x36/0x50
>  xlog_cil_committed+0x19f/0x290 [xfs]
>  xlog_cil_process_committed+0x57/0x80 [xfs]
>  xlog_state_do_callback+0x1e0/0x2a0 [xfs]
>  xlog_ioend_work+0x2f/0x80 [xfs]
>  process_one_work+0x1b6/0x350
>  worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
>  ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
>  kthread+0x11b/0x140
>  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> 
> This patch fixes blk_recalc_rq_segments to be aware of devices which can
> have multi-segment discards. It calculates the correct discard segment
> count by counting the number of bio as each discard bio is considered its
> own segment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-merge.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 808768f6b174..fe7358bd5d09 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -382,6 +382,13 @@ unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
>  
>  	switch (bio_op(rq->bio)) {
>  	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> +		if (queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1) {
> +			struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
> +			for_each_bio(bio)
> +				nr_phys_segs++;
> +			return nr_phys_segs;
> +		}
> +		/* fall through */
>  	case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
>  	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
>  		return 0;

blk_rq_nr_discard_segments() always returns >=1 segments, so no similar
issue in case of single range discard.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

And it can be thought as:

Fixes: 1e739730c5b9 ("block: optionally merge discontiguous discard bios into a single request")


-- 
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 16:48 [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discard requests correctly David Jeffery
2021-02-02  3:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-02 20:43   ` David Jeffery
2021-02-03  2:35     ` Ming Lei
2021-02-03  3:15       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-03 13:50         ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-03 15:08           ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-03  3:18       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-03 16:23       ` David Jeffery
2021-02-04  2:18         ` Ming Lei
2021-02-04  2:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-02-04 16:43   ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-08 18:53     ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-08 18:58     ` John Pittman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210204022740.GB1108591@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).