From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discard requests correctly
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:27:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204022740.GB1108591@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201164850.391332-1-djeffery@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:48:50AM -0500, David Jeffery wrote:
> When a stacked block device inserts a request into another block device
> using blk_insert_cloned_request, the request's nr_phys_segments field gets
> recalculated by a call to blk_recalc_rq_segments in
> blk_cloned_rq_check_limits. But blk_recalc_rq_segments does not know how to
> handle multi-segment discards. For disk types which can handle
> multi-segment discards like nvme, this results in discard requests which
> claim a single segment when it should report several, triggering a warning
> in nvme and causing nvme to fail the discard from the invalid state.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 191 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:700 nvme_setup_discard+0x170/0x1e0 [nvme_core]
> ...
> nvme_setup_cmd+0x217/0x270 [nvme_core]
> nvme_loop_queue_rq+0x51/0x1b0 [nvme_loop]
> __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0xe7/0x1b0
> blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0x41/0x70
> ? blk_account_io_start+0x40/0x50
> dm_mq_queue_rq+0x200/0x3e0
> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x10a/0x7d0
> ? __sbitmap_queue_get+0x25/0x90
> ? elv_rb_del+0x1f/0x30
> ? deadline_remove_request+0x55/0xb0
> ? dd_dispatch_request+0x181/0x210
> __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x144/0x290
> ? bio_attempt_discard_merge+0x134/0x1f0
> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x129/0x180
> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60
> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x47/0xe0
> __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x15b/0x170
> blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x68/0xe0
> blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xf0/0x170
> blk_finish_plug+0x36/0x50
> xlog_cil_committed+0x19f/0x290 [xfs]
> xlog_cil_process_committed+0x57/0x80 [xfs]
> xlog_state_do_callback+0x1e0/0x2a0 [xfs]
> xlog_ioend_work+0x2f/0x80 [xfs]
> process_one_work+0x1b6/0x350
> worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
> ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
> kthread+0x11b/0x140
> ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> This patch fixes blk_recalc_rq_segments to be aware of devices which can
> have multi-segment discards. It calculates the correct discard segment
> count by counting the number of bio as each discard bio is considered its
> own segment.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 808768f6b174..fe7358bd5d09 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -382,6 +382,13 @@ unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
>
> switch (bio_op(rq->bio)) {
> case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> + if (queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1) {
> + struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
> + for_each_bio(bio)
> + nr_phys_segs++;
> + return nr_phys_segs;
> + }
> + /* fall through */
> case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
> case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> return 0;
blk_rq_nr_discard_segments() always returns >=1 segments, so no similar
issue in case of single range discard.
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
And it can be thought as:
Fixes: 1e739730c5b9 ("block: optionally merge discontiguous discard bios into a single request")
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 16:48 [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discard requests correctly David Jeffery
2021-02-02 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-02 20:43 ` David Jeffery
2021-02-03 2:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-03 3:15 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-03 13:50 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-03 15:08 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-03 3:18 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-03 16:23 ` David Jeffery
2021-02-04 2:18 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-04 2:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-02-04 16:43 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-08 18:53 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-08 18:58 ` John Pittman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210204022740.GB1108591@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).