From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 03/13] block: add helper of blk_create_io_context
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:48:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210318164827.1481133-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318164827.1481133-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Add one helper for creating io context and prepare for supporting
efficient bio based io poll.
Meantime move the code of creating io_context before checking bio's
REQ_HIPRI flag because the following patch may change to clear REQ_HIPRI
if io_context can't be created.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a31371d55b9d..d58f8a0c80de 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -792,6 +792,18 @@ static inline blk_status_t blk_check_zone_append(struct request_queue *q,
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
+static inline void blk_create_io_context(struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ /*
+ * Various block parts want %current->io_context, so allocate it up
+ * front rather than dealing with lots of pain to allocate it only
+ * where needed. This may fail and the block layer knows how to live
+ * with it.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
+ create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, q->node);
+}
+
static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct bio *bio)
{
struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev;
@@ -836,6 +848,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct bio *bio)
}
}
+ blk_create_io_context(q);
+
if (!blk_queue_poll(q))
bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_HIPRI;
@@ -876,15 +890,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct bio *bio)
break;
}
- /*
- * Various block parts want %current->io_context, so allocate it up
- * front rather than dealing with lots of pain to allocate it only
- * where needed. This may fail and the block layer knows how to live
- * with it.
- */
- if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
- create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, q->node);
-
if (blk_throtl_bio(bio)) {
blkcg_bio_issue_init(bio);
return false;
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 16:48 [RFC PATCH V2 00/13] block: support bio based io polling Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/13] block: add helper of blk_queue_poll Ming Lei
2021-03-19 16:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-03-23 11:17 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/13] block: add one helper to free io_context Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/13] block: create io poll context for submission and poll task Ming Lei
2021-03-19 17:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-03-23 11:23 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/13] block: add req flag of REQ_TAG Ming Lei
2021-03-19 7:59 ` JeffleXu
2021-03-19 8:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-19 9:47 ` JeffleXu
2021-03-19 17:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-03-23 11:26 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/13] block: add new field into 'struct bvec_iter' Ming Lei
2021-03-19 17:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-03-23 11:29 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/13] block/mq: extract one helper function polling hw queue Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/13] block: prepare for supporting bio_list via other link Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/13] block: use per-task poll context to implement bio based io poll Ming Lei
2021-03-18 17:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-03-18 17:38 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2021-03-19 0:30 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-19 9:38 ` JeffleXu
2021-03-19 13:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-20 5:56 ` JeffleXu
2021-03-23 11:39 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-19 18:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-03-23 11:55 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-23 3:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-23 12:01 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-23 16:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-24 0:10 ` Ming Lei
2021-03-24 15:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/13] block: add queue_to_disk() to get gendisk from request_queue Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 11/13] block: add poll_capable method to support bio-based IO polling Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/13] dm: support IO polling for bio-based dm device Ming Lei
2021-03-18 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH V2 13/13] blk-mq: limit hw queues to be polled in each blk_poll() Ming Lei
2021-03-19 5:50 ` [RFC PATCH V2 00/13] block: support bio based io polling JeffleXu
2021-03-19 18:45 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210318164827.1481133-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).