From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57047C433E0 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D0561942 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229925AbhCSQw6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:52:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56097 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230047AbhCSQwz (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:52:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616172774; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GQrOYOQ4JqTkQFy6p6LfwIHWaCJbsAcGeIAzSro5ONk=; b=NzOCYtjOByw1yNoAomY68fXZpvnLwv8ifFB6Hnp69VlMvlWiNEmtrffrMDVyYsaWt5FJvi IlQxA7VAfIXU8p40l95Fo/g5it/wtLY3wDnOACHynpq42Lza6Oh4+b5zdlaVAd/BRmfFu/ HOwx/kLrhBtTLcPzVxalZfvzyUpXIZs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-73-vNzuYJbmMnm4cjjlYMbbZw-1; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:52:51 -0400 X-MC-Unique: vNzuYJbmMnm4cjjlYMbbZw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9737E1009456; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.18.25.174]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 715F060CD0; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:52:42 -0400 From: Mike Snitzer To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jeffle Xu , dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 01/13] block: add helper of blk_queue_poll Message-ID: <20210319165241.GA9938@redhat.com> References: <20210318164827.1481133-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20210318164827.1481133-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210318164827.1481133-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400, Ming Lei wrote: > There has been 3 users, and will be more, so add one such helper. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei Not sure if you're collecting Reviewed-by or Acked-by at this point? Seems you dropped Chaitanya's Reviewed-by to v1: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2021-March/msg00166.html Do you plan to iterate a lot more before you put out a non-RFC? For this RFC v2, I'll withhold adding any of my Reviewed-by tags and just reply where I see things that might need folding into the next iteration. Mike