From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Yanhui Ma <yama@redhat.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: set default elevator as deadline in case of hctx shared tagset
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:19:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406031933.767228-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
Yanhui found that write performance is degraded a lot after applying
hctx shared tagset on one test machine with megaraid_sas. And turns out
it is caused by none scheduler which becomes default elevator caused by
hctx shared tagset patchset.
Given more scsi HBAs will apply hctx shared tagset, and the similar
performance exists for them too.
So keep previous behavior by still using default mq-deadline for queues
which apply hctx shared tagset, just like before.
Fixes: 32bc15afed04 ("blk-mq: Facilitate a shared sbitmap per tagset")
Reported-by: Yanhui Ma <yama@redhat.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/elevator.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 293c5c81397a..440699c28119 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -621,7 +621,8 @@ static inline bool elv_support_iosched(struct request_queue *q)
*/
static struct elevator_type *elevator_get_default(struct request_queue *q)
{
- if (q->nr_hw_queues != 1)
+ if (q->nr_hw_queues != 1 &&
+ !blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
return NULL;
return elevator_get(q, "mq-deadline", false);
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 3:19 Ming Lei [this message]
2021-04-06 3:49 ` [PATCH] blk-mq: set default elevator as deadline in case of hctx shared tagset Martin K. Petersen
2021-04-06 17:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-06 22:25 ` John Garry
2021-04-07 0:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-07 8:04 ` John Garry
2021-04-07 10:14 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 8:21 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 10:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-08 8:36 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-08 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406031933.767228-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yama@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox