From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] block: use per-task poll context to implement bio based io polling
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:54:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412095427.GA987123@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401021927.343727-9-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:19:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Currently bio based IO polling needs to poll all hw queue blindly, this
> way is very inefficient, and one big reason is that we can't pass any
> bio submission result to blk_poll().
>
> In IO submission context, track associated underlying bios by per-task
> submission queue and store returned 'cookie' in
> bio->bi_iter.bi_private_data, and return current->pid to caller of
> submit_bio() for any bio based driver's IO, which is submitted from FS.
>
> In IO poll context, the passed cookie tells us the PID of submission
> context, then we can find bios from the per-task io pull context of
> submission context. Moving bios from submission queue to poll queue of
> the poll context, and keep polling until these bios are ended. Remove
> bio from poll queue if the bio is ended. Add bio flags of BIO_DONE and
> BIO_END_BY_POLL for such purpose.
>
> In was found in Jeffle Xu's test that kfifo doesn't scale well for a
> submission queue as queue depth is increased, so a new mechanism for
> tracking bios is needed. So far bio's size is close to 2 cacheline size,
> and it may not be accepted to add new field into bio for solving the
> scalability issue by tracking bios via linked list, switch to bio group
> list for tracking bio, the idea is to reuse .bi_end_io for linking bios
> into a linked list for all sharing same .bi_end_io(call it bio group),
> which is recovered before ending bio really, since BIO_END_BY_POLL is
> added for enhancing this point. Usually .bi_end_bio is same for all
> bios in same layer, so it is enough to provide very limited groups, such
> as 16 or less for fixing the scalability issue.
>
> Usually submission shares context with io poll. The per-task poll context
> is just like stack variable, and it is cheap to move data between the two
> per-task queues.
>
> Also when the submission task is exiting, drain pending IOs in the context
> until all are done.
>
> Tested-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/bio.c | 5 +
> block/blk-core.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> block/blk-ioc.c | 3 +
> block/blk-mq.c | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> block/blk.h | 10 ++
> include/linux/blk_types.h | 26 +++-
> 6 files changed, 439 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 26b7f721cda8..04c043dc60fc 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -1402,6 +1402,11 @@ static inline bool bio_remaining_done(struct bio *bio)
> **/
> void bio_endio(struct bio *bio)
> {
> + /* BIO_END_BY_POLL has to be set before calling submit_bio */
> + if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_END_BY_POLL)) {
> + bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_DONE);
> + return;
> + }
Why can't driver that implements bio based polling call a separate
bio_endio_polled instead?
> +static inline void *bio_grp_data(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + return bio->bi_poll;
> +}
What is the purpose of this helper? And why does it have to lose the
type information?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 2:19 [PATCH V5 00/12] block: support bio based io polling Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 01/12] block: add helper of blk_queue_poll Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 02/12] block: add one helper to free io_context Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 03/12] block: create io poll context for submission and poll task Ming Lei
2021-04-12 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 04/12] block: add req flag of REQ_POLL_CTX Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 05/12] block: add new field into 'struct bvec_iter' Ming Lei
2021-04-12 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-13 9:36 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 06/12] block/mq: extract one helper function polling hw queue Ming Lei
2021-04-12 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 07/12] block: prepare for supporting bio_list via other link Ming Lei
2021-04-12 10:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-12 11:37 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 08/12] block: use per-task poll context to implement bio based io polling Ming Lei
2021-04-12 9:54 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-04-12 10:20 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-12 10:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-12 11:42 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-12 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-12 10:37 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 09/12] blk-mq: limit hw queues to be polled in each blk_poll() Ming Lei
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 10/12] block: add queue_to_disk() to get gendisk from request_queue Ming Lei
2021-04-12 12:52 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 11/12] block: add poll_capable method to support bio-based IO polling Ming Lei
2021-04-12 9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-14 8:38 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-14 11:24 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 1:34 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-15 7:43 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 9:21 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-15 10:06 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 11:21 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-15 13:08 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 8:00 ` [PATCH] block: introduce QUEUE_FLAG_POLL_CAP flag Jeffle Xu
2021-04-16 8:42 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-16 9:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 10:20 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-17 14:06 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-19 2:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-19 5:40 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-19 13:36 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-20 7:25 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-01 2:19 ` [PATCH V5 12/12] dm: support IO polling for bio-based dm device Ming Lei
2021-04-09 15:39 ` [PATCH V5 00/12] block: support bio based io polling Ming Lei
2021-04-12 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210412095427.GA987123@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).