From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:57:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210425085753.2617424-9-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210425085753.2617424-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
refcount_inc_not_zero() in bt_tags_iter() still may read one freed
request.
Fix the issue by the following approach:
1) hold a per-tags spinlock when reading ->rqs[tag] and calling
refcount_inc_not_zero in bt_tags_iter()
2) clearing stale request referred via ->rqs[tag] before freeing
request pool, the per-tags spinlock is held for clearing stale
->rq[tag]
So after we cleared stale requests, bt_tags_iter() won't observe
freed request any more, also the clearing will wait for pending
request reference.
The idea of clearing ->rqs[] is borrowed from John Garry's previous
patch and one recent David's patch.
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 9 ++++++++-
block/blk-mq-tag.h | 3 +++
block/blk-mq.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 489d2db89856..402a7860f6c9 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -265,10 +265,12 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
bool reserved = iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_RESERVED;
struct request *rq;
bool ret;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!reserved)
bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
/*
* We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
* test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
@@ -277,8 +279,12 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
else
rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
- if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
+ if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
return true;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
+
if ((iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED) &&
!blk_mq_request_started(rq))
ret = true;
@@ -524,6 +530,7 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int total_tags,
tags->nr_tags = total_tags;
tags->nr_reserved_tags = reserved_tags;
+ spin_lock_init(&tags->lock);
if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
return tags;
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
index 7d3e6b333a4a..f942a601b5ef 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct blk_mq_tags {
struct request **rqs;
struct request **static_rqs;
struct list_head page_list;
+
+ /* used to clear rqs[] before one request pool is freed */
+ spinlock_t lock;
};
extern struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int nr_tags,
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9a4d520740a1..1f913f786c1f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2307,6 +2307,38 @@ blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
}
+static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
+{
+ return (size_t)PAGE_SIZE << order;
+}
+
+/* called before freeing request pool in @tags */
+static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
+ struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int hctx_idx)
+{
+ struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &tags->page_list, lru) {
+ unsigned long start = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
+ unsigned long end = start + order_to_size(page->private);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < set->queue_depth; i++) {
+ struct request *rq = drv_tags->rqs[i];
+ unsigned long rq_addr = (unsigned long)rq;
+
+ if (rq_addr >= start && rq_addr < end) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&rq->ref) != 0);
+ cmpxchg(&drv_tags->rqs[i], rq, NULL);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
+}
+
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
unsigned int hctx_idx)
{
@@ -2325,6 +2357,8 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
}
}
+ blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx);
+
while (!list_empty(&tags->page_list)) {
page = list_first_entry(&tags->page_list, struct page, lru);
list_del_init(&page->lru);
@@ -2384,11 +2418,6 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
return tags;
}
-static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
-{
- return (size_t)PAGE_SIZE << order;
-}
-
static int blk_mq_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
unsigned int hctx_idx, int node)
{
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-25 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-25 8:57 [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] Revert "blk-mq: Fix races between blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() and iterating over tags" Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] Revert "blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list" Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] Revert "blk-mq: Fix races between iterating over requests and freeing requests" Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] Revert "blk-mq: Introduce atomic variants of blk_mq_(all_tag|tagset_busy)_iter" Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: blk_mq_complete_request_locally Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: drivers: complete request locally from blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-26 3:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26 6:24 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 8:54 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-25 18:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26 0:41 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25 8:57 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-04-25 20:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26 0:49 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 1:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26 2:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25 9:27 ` [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-25 20:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26 1:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 1:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-25 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-25 18:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-25 20:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210425085753.2617424-9-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox