From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me, hch@lst.de,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@purestorage.com>,
Casey Chen <cachen@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] nvme: use return value from blk_execute_rq()
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210426144216.GD20668@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423220558.40764-5-kbusch@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:05:57PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> We don't have an nvme status to report if the driver's .queue_rq()
> returns an error without dispatching the requested nvme command. Use the
> return value from blk_execute_rq() for all passthrough commands so the
> caller may know their command was not successful.
>
> If the command is from the target passthrough interface and fails to
> dispatch, synthesize the response back to the host as a internal target
> error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 6 +-----
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 2 +-
> drivers/nvme/target/passthru.c | 8 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 10bb8406e067..62af5fe7a0ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -972,12 +972,12 @@ int __nvme_submit_sync_cmd(struct request_queue *q, struct nvme_command *cmd,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - blk_execute_rq(NULL, req, at_head);
> + ret = blk_execute_rq(NULL, req, at_head);
> if (result)
> *result = nvme_req(req)->result;
> if (nvme_req(req)->flags & NVME_REQ_CANCELLED)
> ret = -EINTR;
> - else
> + else if (nvme_req(req)->status)
> ret = nvme_req(req)->status;
Just cosmetic, and already in the existing code, but I'd prefer if we
could keep the ret assignments together, something like:
status = blk_execute_rq(NULL, req, at_head);
if (nvme_req(req)->flags & NVME_REQ_CANCELLED)
ret = -EINTR;
else if (nvme_req(req)->status)
ret = nvme_req(req)->status;
else
ret = blk_status_to_errno(status);
if (result)
*result = nvme_req(req)->result;
> + ret = blk_execute_rq(disk, rq, 0);
> if (effects) /* nothing to be done for zero cmd effects */
> nvme_passthru_end(ctrl, effects);
> +
> + if (nvme_req(rq)->flags & NVME_REQ_CANCELLED)
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + else if (nvme_req(rq)->status)
> + ret = nvme_req(rq)->status;
> +
I think we want a helper for all this return value magic instead of
duplicating it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 22:05 [PATCHv2 0/5] block and nvme passthrough error handling Keith Busch
2021-04-23 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] block: support polling through blk_execute_rq Keith Busch
2021-04-26 6:34 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 16:43 ` Kanchan Joshi
2021-04-23 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] nvme: use blk_execute_rq() for passthrough commands Keith Busch
2021-04-26 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-23 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] block: return errors from blk_execute_rq() Keith Busch
2021-04-26 6:42 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-23 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] nvme: use return value " Keith Busch
2021-04-26 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-04-26 17:10 ` Yuanyuan Zhong
2021-04-26 17:15 ` Keith Busch
2021-04-26 17:39 ` Yuanyuan Zhong
2021-04-23 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] nvme: allow user passthrough commands to poll Keith Busch
2021-04-26 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-26 15:15 ` Keith Busch
2021-05-17 16:55 ` Kanchan Joshi
2021-05-17 17:14 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210426144216.GD20668@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cachen@purestorage.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yzhong@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox