From: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:30:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428143013.GA31155@redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427151058.2833168-4-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:10:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>
> refcount_inc_not_zero() in bt_tags_iter() still may read one freed
> request.
>
> Fix the issue by the following approach:
>
> 1) hold a per-tags spinlock when reading ->rqs[tag] and calling
> refcount_inc_not_zero in bt_tags_iter()
>
This method of closing the race still in my original patch is very nice.
It's a great improvement.
> 2) clearing stale request referred via ->rqs[tag] before freeing
> request pool, the per-tags spinlock is held for clearing stale
> ->rq[tag]
>
> So after we cleared stale requests, bt_tags_iter() won't observe
> freed request any more, also the clearing will wait for pending
> request reference.
>
> The idea of clearing ->rqs[] is borrowed from John Garry's previous
> patch and one recent David's patch.
>
However, when you took my original cmpxchg patch and merged my separate
function to do the cmpxchg cleaning into blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping, you
missed why it was a separate function. Your patch will clean out the
static_rqs requests which are being freed, but it doesn't clean out the
special flush request that gets allocated individually by a
request_queue. The flush request can be put directly into the rqs[]
array so it also needs to be cleaned when a request_queue is being
torn down. This was the second caller of my separated cleaning function.
With that portion of my original patch removed, a stale pointer to a
freed flush request can still remain after a request_queue is released.
David Jeffery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 15:10 [PATCH V3 0/3] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] block: avoid double io accounting for flush request Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-27 20:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-28 0:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-28 1:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-28 2:22 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-04-28 14:30 ` David Jeffery [this message]
2021-04-28 15:24 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210428143013.GA31155@redhat \
--to=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox