From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] block/mq-deadline: Reserve 25% of tags for synchronous requests
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 18:01:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210527010134.32448-8-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527010134.32448-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
For interactive workloads it is important that synchronous requests are
not delayed. Hence reserve 25% of tags for synchronous requests. This patch
still allows asynchronous requests to fill the hardware queues since
blk_mq_init_sched() makes sure that the number of scheduler requests is the
double of the hardware queue depth. From blk_mq_init_sched():
q->nr_requests = 2 * min_t(unsigned int, q->tag_set->queue_depth,
BLKDEV_MAX_RQ);
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
block/mq-deadline.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 2ab844a4b6b5..81f487d77e09 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct deadline_data {
int fifo_batch;
int writes_starved;
int front_merges;
+ u32 async_depth;
spinlock_t lock;
spinlock_t zone_lock;
@@ -399,6 +400,38 @@ static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
return rq;
}
+static void dd_limit_depth(unsigned int op, struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
+{
+ struct deadline_data *dd = data->q->elevator->elevator_data;
+
+ /* Do not throttle synchronous reads. */
+ if (op_is_sync(op) && !op_is_write(op))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Throttle asynchronous requests and writes such that these requests
+ * do not block the allocation of synchronous requests.
+ */
+ data->shallow_depth = dd->async_depth;
+}
+
+static void dd_depth_updated(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+ struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
+ struct deadline_data *dd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
+ struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->sched_tags;
+
+ dd->async_depth = 3 * q->nr_requests / 4;
+
+ sbitmap_queue_min_shallow_depth(tags->bitmap_tags, dd->async_depth);
+}
+
+static int dd_init_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned int hctx_idx)
+{
+ dd_depth_updated(hctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void dd_exit_sched(struct elevator_queue *e)
{
struct deadline_data *dd = e->elevator_data;
@@ -744,6 +777,15 @@ static int deadline_starved_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
return 0;
}
+static int dd_async_depth_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ struct request_queue *q = data;
+ struct deadline_data *dd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
+
+ seq_printf(m, "%u\n", dd->async_depth);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void *deadline_dispatch_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
__acquires(&dd->lock)
{
@@ -786,6 +828,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr deadline_queue_debugfs_attrs[] = {
DEADLINE_QUEUE_DDIR_ATTRS(write),
{"batching", 0400, deadline_batching_show},
{"starved", 0400, deadline_starved_show},
+ {"async_depth", 0400, dd_async_depth_show},
{"dispatch", 0400, .seq_ops = &deadline_dispatch_seq_ops},
{},
};
@@ -794,6 +837,8 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr deadline_queue_debugfs_attrs[] = {
static struct elevator_type mq_deadline = {
.ops = {
+ .depth_updated = dd_depth_updated,
+ .limit_depth = dd_limit_depth,
.insert_requests = dd_insert_requests,
.dispatch_request = dd_dispatch_request,
.prepare_request = dd_prepare_request,
@@ -807,6 +852,7 @@ static struct elevator_type mq_deadline = {
.has_work = dd_has_work,
.init_sched = dd_init_sched,
.exit_sched = dd_exit_sched,
+ .init_hctx = dd_init_hctx,
},
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEBUG_FS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 1:01 [PATCH 0/9] Improve I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] block/mq-deadline: Add several comments Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 3:03 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 6:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 19:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 8:43 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-27 15:13 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] block/mq-deadline: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 2:25 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-05-27 3:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 8:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-27 15:14 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] block/mq-deadline: Remove two local variables Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 2:26 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-05-27 3:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 8:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-27 15:15 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] block/mq-deadline: Rename dd_init_queue() and dd_exit_queue() Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 2:27 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-05-27 3:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 19:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 6:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 8:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-27 15:16 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] block/mq-deadline: Improve compile-time argument checking Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 2:28 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-05-27 3:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-28 1:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 6:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 8:49 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-27 15:19 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] block/mq-deadline: Reduce the read expiry time for non-rotational media Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 2:30 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-05-27 3:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 19:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 15:20 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-27 1:01 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-05-27 3:33 ` [PATCH 7/9] block/mq-deadline: Reserve 25% of tags for synchronous requests Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 20:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 6:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 19:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 3:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 20:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 20:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-28 1:40 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-27 1:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] block/mq-deadline: Add cgroup support Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 7:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-27 6:25 ` [PATCH 0/9] Improve I/O priority support Wang Jianchao
2021-05-27 8:05 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-05-27 18:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-28 2:05 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-05-28 8:43 ` Paolo Valente
2021-05-28 16:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 8:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-27 17:23 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-05-27 19:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 17:58 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-05-27 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-27 22:45 ` Adam Manzanares
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210527010134.32448-8-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adam.manzanares@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox