From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Ding Senjie <dingsenjie@yulong.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] md: bcache: Fix spelling of 'acquire'
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:38:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020143812.6403-2-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211020143812.6403-1-colyli@suse.de>
From: Ding Senjie <dingsenjie@yulong.com>
acqurie -> acquire
Signed-off-by: Ding Senjie <dingsenjie@yulong.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 185246a0d855..ab64b7762b6e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ static int bcache_reboot(struct notifier_block *n, unsigned long code, void *x)
* The reason bch_register_lock is not held to call
* bch_cache_set_stop() and bcache_device_stop() is to
* avoid potential deadlock during reboot, because cache
- * set or bcache device stopping process will acqurie
+ * set or bcache device stopping process will acquire
* bch_register_lock too.
*
* We are safe here because bcache_is_reboot sets to
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-20 14:38 [PATCH 0/8] bcache patches for Linux v5.16 (first wave) Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` Coly Li [this message]
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] bcache: reserve never used bits from bkey.high Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] bcache: fix error info in register_bcache() Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] bcache: move calc_cached_dev_sectors to proper place on backing device detach Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] bcache: remove the cache_dev_name field from struct cache Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] bcache: remove the backing_dev_name field from struct cached_dev Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] bcache: use bvec_kmap_local in bch_data_verify Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] bcache: remove bch_crc64_update Coly Li
2021-10-20 14:41 ` [PATCH 0/8] bcache patches for Linux v5.16 (first wave) Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211020143812.6403-2-colyli@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dingsenjie@yulong.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox