From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8011EC433FE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6656460ED4 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231325AbhJZHUX (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 03:20:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60712 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230192AbhJZHUV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 03:20:21 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8CC436732D; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:17:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:17:54 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bart Van Assche , Christoph Hellwig , axboe@kernel.dk, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: revert HPB support Message-ID: <20211026071754.GA31930@lst.de> References: <20211022062011.1262184-1-hch@lst.de> <4199e780-32e5-a1ce-65ba-85e0b7a3eda5@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:13:46AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Greg, > > > Under this line of reasoning, why would upstream take the code at all? > > > > {sigh} > > Sigh indeed. > > > Is there a link to where the HPB developer said they would look into > > this? Perhaps until that happens this should be marked as BROKEN? > > I say we just mark it broken for now. I've sent a patch.