From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: Revert "bcache: use bvec_virt"
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 17:19:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211103161955.GA394@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d1180e0-32bc-e571-3252-ce496508d2b5@suse.de>
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 12:11:45AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> fresh page for each vec, and bio_for_each_segment_all iterates page
>> by page. IFF there is an offset there is proble in the surrounding
>> code as bch_bio_alloc_pages assumes that it is called on a freshly
>> allocate and initialized bio.
>
> Yes, the offset is modified in bch_bio_alloc_pages().
Where? In my upstream copy of bch_bio_alloc_pages there is no bv_offset
manipulation, and I could not see how such a manipulation would make
sense.
> Normally the bcache
> defined block size is 4KB so the issue was not triggered frequently. I
> found it during testing my nvdimm enabling code for bcache, where I happen
> to make the bcache defined block size to non-4KB. The offset is from the
> previous written bkey set, which the minimized unit size is 1
> bcache-defined-block-size.
So you have some out of tree changes here? Copying a PAGE_SIZE into
a 'segment' bvec just does not make any sense if there is an offset,
as segments are defined as bvecs that do not span page boundaries.
I suspect the best thing to do in do_btree_node_write would be something
like the patch below instead of poking into the internals here, but I'd
also really like to understand the root cause as it does point to a bug
somewhere else.
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 93b67b8d31c3d..f69914848f32f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static void do_btree_node_write(struct btree *b)
struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, b->bio, iter_all) {
- memcpy(bvec_virt(bv), addr, PAGE_SIZE);
- addr += PAGE_SIZE;
+ memcpy_to_bvec(bvec_virt(bv), addr);
+ addr += bv->bv_len;
}
bch_submit_bbio(b->bio, b->c, &k.key, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 15:10 [PATCH] bcache: Revert "bcache: use bvec_virt" Coly Li
2021-11-03 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-03 16:11 ` Coly Li
2021-11-03 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-11-04 4:25 ` Coly Li
2021-11-04 20:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-06 13:36 ` Coly Li
2021-11-08 8:16 ` Coly Li
2021-11-09 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-08 13:23 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211103161955.GA394@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).